SVX Network Forums Live Chat! SVX or Subaru Links Old Lockers Photo Post How-To Documents Message Archive SVX Shop Search |
IRC users: |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
sts turbo
anyone thought of trying to use an STS turbo setup? i was looking at it but my only concern is that the turbo could possibly bottom out.
__________________
Tranny goes in, tranny comes out, tranny goes in.....AW ****, tranny comes out.... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sts turbo
I've thought about it. There's no reason why it wouldn't work, the remote design has been used on cars with a similar or more cluttered underbody design with good success. The F body camaro comes to mind because of the transverse muffler and the severe lack of space anywhere under the car.
IMHO I think this design could be the easiest and most cost effective way of turbocharging an SVX if somebody made a kit. You don't have to deal with running hot pipes around your engine bay, or trying to find a space just big enough to mount the turbo. Also, I'm guessing most people that bring up the issue of lag due to the extra piping have never ridden in a car that has one . |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sts turbo
This is how I will be turbocharging mine. Owner of Motorsports Warehouse (Dayle?) has brought up the idea before after installing it on a different car but I haven't heard anything about it since.
If you read up on it just about everyone uses the turbo as a muffler, so I was planning to plant the turbo in that area. If your exhaust has bottomed out, then the turbo shouldn't either. Last edited by STeeL25T; 10-13-2010 at 07:51 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: sts turbo
I moved your post for you.
__________________
. Earl .... ... .... ><SVX(*> Subaru Ambassador [COLOR=”silver”]1992 Tri Color L[/COLOR] ~45K (06/91) #2430 1992 Dark Teal LS-L ~184K (05/91) #0739 1992 Claret LS-L ~196K (05/91) #0831 1992 Pearl LS-L ~103K (06/91) #1680 1992 Pearl LS-L ~151K (06/91) #2229 1992 Dark Teal LS ~150K (07/91) #3098 (parts car) 1992 White LS-L ~139K (08/92) #6913 1993 25th AE ~98K (02/93) #164 1993 25th AE ~58K (02/93) #176 1993 25th AE ~107K (02/93) #215 1993 25th AE ~162K (02/93) #223 1994 Laguna Blue Pearl LSi ~124K (1/94) #2408 1994 Laguna Blue Pearl LSi ~144K (10/93) #1484 1994 Laguna Blue Pearl LSi ~68K (10/93) #1525 1994 Barcelona Red LSi ~46K (02/94) #2624 1994 Pearl LSi ~41K (12/93) #1961 1995 Bordeaux Pearl LSi ~70K (02/95) #855 1996 Polo Green LSi ~95K (03/96) #872 1997 Bordeaux Pearl LSi ~55K (08/96) #097 2003 Brilliant Red LS1 Convertible ~29K (04/03) #8951 1999 Magnetic Red LS1 Coupe ~33K (04/99) #6420 My Email | Old Locker | New Locker | Picture of 15 of the 19 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: sts turbo
thanks earl wasnt sure if this was general enough or not.
i guess bottoming out really isnt an issue i guess for me it will be for during the winters getting it all covered in snow and ice, expecially the intake cone, a snorkle would have to be fashioned i guess. I wonder how emissions are or do the systems still run a cat?
__________________
Tranny goes in, tranny comes out, tranny goes in.....AW ****, tranny comes out.... |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: sts turbo
Quote:
One given dyno: 3000 RPM: 2.5psi 4000 RPM: 10psi (full boost) Those pounds show up on an exponential curve, as well. If that's not lag, then I'm not sure what is. If you're a drag star, then I suppose that's all right. For autocross, that's a matter of self-hatred, though. After a ride in my car, my WRX pals bawl about waiting for full boost at 3000 RPM. 4000? Street Mod is giggling. Don't kid yourself - this system has lag. Why would there be reverse manifolds on WRXi with front mount intercoolers if a short distance didn't matter?
__________________
Disclaimer: The above post is on the internet. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sts turbo
Besides the lag, as mentioned above. my only other concerns with a design with the turbo by the muffler is the extremely long oil lines, i just don't like the idea of oil lines running the full length of my car, atleast not on something i DD.
I'm still trying to figure out why none of you guys have tried using a Rotrex SC yet.... seems like a better way to blow a few grand if you ask me.
__________________
94 Acura Integra GSR 97 Legacy Brighton - EG33 Swap still in progress 03 Silverado 2500 - Duramax |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sts turbo
Quote:
I personally am not a fan since it works in a very similar way to a turbo. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sts turbo
i'v seen svxfiles set up, its still not a rotrex blower though, but could be set up about the same way.
__________________
94 Acura Integra GSR 97 Legacy Brighton - EG33 Swap still in progress 03 Silverado 2500 - Duramax |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: sts turbo
Quote:
Forced induction is good - there's no denying that. It's just a matter of choosing what's right for you. What's in your wallet? What's in your toolbox? Where do you want your powerband? How much custom work do you want done on your car? The STS looks to be an economical solution. I get the feeling that there's no bolt-on solution for the SVX, but the work to get the task done doesn't look as difficult as that to install an underhood turbo (the STS should be much easier on spatial constraints!) If you can wait out the lag (and there will be lag) and if you can sort out the intake, then it would probably treat you well. I just don't have the time for it, though.
__________________
Disclaimer: The above post is on the internet. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: sts turbo
Quote:
Tom |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sts turbo
would the sts turbo work better if you used it as a secondary charger
ie. having it turbo'd or s/c'd normally at the engine as well ? super-turbo? lol |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: sts turbo
to run a twin charged engine with any decent results for the cost, you would want a large turbo... With that kind of heat loss and velocity loss that far back in the system... I doubt it would spool by 10k RPM
Tom |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: sts turbo
+1. A regular old single will do great.
__________________
~Phil Teal 1992 Subaru SVX Turbo - Sold in May 2011 to peace-frog. |
|
|