The Subaru SVX World Network

The Subaru SVX World Network (https://www.subaru-svx.net/forum/index.php)
-   Technical Q & A (https://www.subaru-svx.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   MAF sensor swap question (https://www.subaru-svx.net/forum/showthread.php?t=63429)

Jvan 04-24-2015 09:29 AM

MAF sensor swap question
 
My 94 SVX has stalling problem due to the MAF sensor. I have tried to spray clean it but problem still exists. A new one from the dealer is about $400 and ebay lists mostly re-manufactured ones for about $170. Ebay has tons of MAF sensor for Legacy's/Impreza's/Forester's for $23/$60+ and $!00+; the part #'s are almost identical to the SVX # except for the last 4 digits (SVX- AA200 and others are 2 digits/letter and digits ranging from 160 to 201). They all look the same, so are any other Subaru model MAF sensors compatible/swap for the SVX.Subaru raided the parts bin for many other part (Legacy calipers) so I'm sure that they didn't make a MAF sensor just for the limited SVX.

gwynethh 04-24-2015 10:10 AM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
Someone said they work just fine except for the very highest rpm/air flow. Fine for everything except maybe the track.

Blacky 04-24-2015 01:16 PM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
Did you look at the "How To" for re-soldering the connections inside, it's really simple and works.

1986nate 04-25-2015 12:21 AM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
An EJ MAF should only be used for diagnostic. It does not measure the air properly ratioed for the SVX ecu and will run the car lean. This is bad for long term use. So, to confirm yours is bad, and someone has an EJ Subaru with a MAF, go ahead and swap to confirm. Then get a replacement.

Jvan 04-25-2015 05:46 PM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
No, I didn't look on how to re soldering since other Subaru MAF sensors were so inexpensive but if the other Subaru Mafs don't work, I'll have to try it. I'm not about to spend $400 for something that can be bought for other cars at a minimal cost.

gwynethh 04-26-2015 05:36 AM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1986nate (Post 739934)
An EJ MAF should only be used for diagnostic. It does not measure the air properly ratioed for the SVX ecu and will run the car lean. This is bad for long term use. So, to confirm yours is bad, and someone has an EJ Subaru with a MAF, go ahead and swap to confirm. Then get a replacement.

Thanx for the info Nate!

Jvan 05-01-2015 03:58 PM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
Searching through some old MAF threads and came across a thread swapping a N62 MAF sensor from a Z32. Is this a recommended swap for a stock engine or do I need to upgrade injectors and more?

icingdeath88 05-01-2015 07:17 PM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
You need the whole set - ecutune stage 2 chip, z32 MAF, and 370cc injectors.

1986nate 05-03-2015 01:15 PM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
Also, fyi. aftermarket MAFs are around $200 new for the SVX with warranty and work well.

elemgee 05-10-2015 07:38 PM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
I recently had a problem similar to yours - my SVX would stall when coming to a stop, or right after I accelerated from a stop. I was getting an engine code 23 which is the MAF sensor. I replaced it with one for a 97 Legacy with the 2.5 liter engine which I got from ebay for around $35. Works just fine. Only very small issue was connecting the electrical plug to the sensor was a tight fit, but thats it. Car has been running fine now for a couple of hundred miles. I just checked and there are a bunch of similar MAFs on ebay.

Jvan 05-10-2015 08:10 PM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
I'm very tempted to do the same thing. The new MAF sensors on ebay for other Subaru's are very reasonable but the SVX sensor is way over priced. Even $200+ for an aftermarket isn't reasonable. I'm hesitating because other posts have recommended against using the 4 cylinder sensors. Even the z62 sensor can be purchased new for under $50. I'm driving locally so a few stalls isn't so bad. For $400, I'm going to try to solder the sensor.

92snowmachine 05-10-2015 09:16 PM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
try soldering first but it that doesn't work i would run with it disconnected before paying money for the wrong part. if you disconnect it when the car is off it will run with out it. you will run rich because it will set a code and force the car into open loop but it's a lot better than running the chance of going too lean because your maf is the wrong one.

Sean486 05-11-2015 05:20 AM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
Buy the Legacy sensor and use that to get the car working. Take the SVX MAF Off and resolder it, or send it to someone to resolder it for you. When done, swap them and put the Legacy MAF on the shelf for backup.

1986nate 05-11-2015 08:16 PM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by elemgee (Post 740191)
I recently had a problem similar to yours - my SVX would stall when coming to a stop, or right after I accelerated from a stop. I was getting an engine code 23 which is the MAF sensor. I replaced it with one for a 97 Legacy with the 2.5 liter engine which I got from ebay for around $35. Works just fine. Only very small issue was connecting the electrical plug to the sensor was a tight fit, but thats it. Car has been running fine now for a couple of hundred miles. I just checked and there are a bunch of similar MAFs on ebay.

You also risk burning a valve from running lean along with cat converter failures. Which only show up after prolonged running.

oab_au 06-10-2015 08:47 PM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
There is a need to clear this up before it becomes "Internet law".:)

The graph the Michael showed, has the two curves for the two Mass Air Flow units, they are very similar, slight different at full voltage readings.
The voltage rises as the air flow increases, the ECU uses this to set the fuel and the spark settings, when the voltage signal reaches maximum reading, the ECU goes to the full throttle settings that apply max fuel and spark setting, for a fully loaded engine.

http://www.subiechips.com/posts/vqComp.gif

The point that people are missing is that the max. voltage reading for the two units are at different air flows. The 3.3 unit reaches full voltage when it is passing 3.3 lts of air. the Legacy reaches max voltage when it passes 2.2lts. of air. So when you fit the Legacy unit to the SVX it goes into full fuel and spark settings when 2.2lts is passing, it then holds this same voltage setting while the last 1.1lts is passed.

So it won't run lean, it will actually run the same full throttle settings as the SVX unit does, only doing it 33% earlier.

Of course this will only happen at full throttle, when in open loop, at normal driving in closed loop, the Svx will use the O2 sensors to use the same settings as it does with its own MAF fitted.

92snowmachine 06-10-2015 09:49 PM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
the problem is the limits of the fuel trim. it may seem like a small amount but the fuel trim is probably not capable of compensating for the difference. I would run with unplugged before using the wrong maf. you will always be in open loop so you will run a rich mixture based solely on engine rpm and ect. I have never torn down an svx motor that had issues with this but I have torn down motors because the maf was bad and the pitting on the pistons can be significant.

fasteract7 06-16-2015 10:33 AM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by oab_au (Post 740645)
There is a need to clear this up before it becomes "Internet law".:)

The graph the Michael showed, has the two curves for the two Mass Air Flow units, they are very similar, slight different at full voltage readings.
The voltage rises as the air flow increases, the ECU uses this to set the fuel and the spark settings, when the voltage signal reaches maximum reading, the ECU goes to the full throttle settings that apply max fuel and spark setting, for a fully loaded engine.

http://www.subiechips.com/posts/vqComp.gif

The point that people are missing is that the max. voltage reading for the two units are at different air flows. The 3.3 unit reaches full voltage when it is passing 3.3 lts of air. the Legacy reaches max voltage when it passes 2.2lts. of air. So when you fit the Legacy unit to the SVX it goes into full fuel and spark settings when 2.2lts is passing, it then holds this same voltage setting while the last 1.1lts is passed.

So it won't run lean, it will actually run the same full throttle settings as the SVX unit does, only doing it 33% earlier.

Of course this will only happen at full throttle, when in open loop, at normal driving in closed loop, the Svx will use the O2 sensors to use the same settings as it does with its own MAF fitted.



Thanks Harvey for the graph objective data. This confirms what my wideband O2 sensor has been showing me with a Legacy MAF in my SVX. No evidence of a too lean AFR ( never see anything greater than 11.2 at partial/WOT conditions and that is the max. spike , never steady state). This is with 2 new Os2 sensors. If anything, my SVX is running a more correct N/A AFR than with the OEM SVX MAF which was putting out numbers in the low 10's..."we run rich".

longassname 06-17-2015 09:18 AM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
I posted that graph in a different thread where I was asking the person who was promoting the use of the legacy afm if someone had obtained the data necessary to properly compare the meters or not. It doesn't sound like anyone has. The translation tables only show the shapes of the air flow meters responses. You need to know the scales to multiply those values by to make comparisons.

I'll be happy to do the math and post it with an explanation if anyone decides they want to get the injector flow data. If someone sends a legacy injector and SVX injector to be flow tested at the same time and provides me the flow test data I can use that data to determine what fractions of the K constants in each car's firmware relate to the scaling of the meters and make accurate comparisons of the meters.

MrSefe 06-22-2015 09:54 AM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
I've been running my SVX with Legacy MAF for some 4-6 months and for me, it feels more responsive with it. I do lot of WOT overtakes and have had no problems.

I'd also like to note that there's a little choke on the legacy MAF housing so could it be that electronics are actually identical and the measured difference is caused by the choke?

http://www.subaru-svx.net/forum/pict...0&pictureid=59

longassname 06-28-2015 08:15 AM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
Nobody knows the "measured difference." If somebody does they haven't provided the information to the rest of us.

I extracted the translation table from a car I believe uses the meter being promoted as a substitute and provided that graph so that the similarities/differences in the shape of the translation curve would be known but you still need to know the scale to multiply the readings by to make any comparison. 2v on one meter could equal the reading at 5v on the other. If it was that far off one of you would have blown your cars up already but still you have no real idea how they compare yet because nobody has bothered to put in the work.

Another method that could be used to obtain the necessary data is to plumb one meter right after the other and log the readings out of both meters at the same time. Or even just get one measurement from each meter at a reasonably high air flow. Tape one to the end of the other installed in the car and have one person hold the revs up and steady while another measures the voltage out of the meter with a multi-meter.

Jvan 07-14-2015 09:08 AM

Re: MAF sensor swap question
 
I've been searching Ebay and came across this seller for the MAF sensor. He's much less expensive than a dealer and it's a NEW MAF not rebuilt/reconditioned. It still costs more than MAF sensors for other Subaru models but it is specifically a SVX sensor. So far my car has responded well and no more stalling/restarting. I'm more than satisfied w/seller and the sensor so if anyone needs a MAF sensor check this seller: http://www.ebay.com/itm/400949068391...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122