The Subaru SVX World Network   SVX Network Forums
Live Chat!
SVX or Subaru Links
Old Lockers
Photo Post
How-To Documents
Message Archive
SVX Shop Search
IRC users:

Go Back   The Subaru SVX World Network > SVX Main Forums > Technical Q & A

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-09-2004, 08:17 AM
n00b on demand's Avatar
n00b on demand n00b on demand is offline
OMGWTFBBQ!!1!11!LMAOROFLC OPTER
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,114
H-6 versus V-6

I have always wanted to know what makes an H-6 engine better than a V-6. I know that our engines are horizontally opposed but what makes that better? Does it make any more power? I know Subaru and Porsche both make horizontally opposed engines but when somoene asks me what kind of engine i have and i say H-6 their always like what are you talking about. I was just wondering what the major differences were and which was better (of course whatever an svx has is better) .
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-09-2004, 08:33 AM
SVXer95 SVXer95 is offline
Word to Yo Motha
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Posts: 1,637
Send a message via AIM to SVXer95
Smoother running due to the horizontal design.

I believe that the biggest positive aspect of the flat engine is the low center of gravity. The motors can sit lower in the chassis. Other than that, I don't think flat motors make more power or do anything else that much better. If they did, everyone would use them!
__________________
Collin

1995 L AWD
Locker

1987 Porsche 944 turbo
80k miles. MBC + Chips. Relatively Stock
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-09-2004, 08:35 AM
Chiketkd's Avatar
Chiketkd Chiketkd is offline
Row faster...I hear banjos!!!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 10,334
One design doesn't make more power than the other, but they both have inherent pluses and minuses...

H-6 engines are flatter and can fit in 'vertically challenged' engine bays. Due to their zero interference, if belts break, no internal damage is done to the moving parts.

V-6 engines are taller but take up less lateral room.

Both engine designs can utilize variable valve timing, and both have been developed to outputs exceeding 100bhp per L.

...just my $0.02

-Chike
__________________
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." - Plato

2013 Cosmic Blue 5spd Evo X GSR
2006 Galaxy Gray 6MT RX-8 (sold)
2006 Steel Gray WRX TR (sold)
1996 Brilliant Red SVX L (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-09-2004, 08:48 AM
SVXer95 SVXer95 is offline
Word to Yo Motha
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Posts: 1,637
Send a message via AIM to SVXer95
Not all flat motors are non-interference....
__________________
Collin

1995 L AWD
Locker

1987 Porsche 944 turbo
80k miles. MBC + Chips. Relatively Stock
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-09-2004, 08:57 AM
red95svx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Small airplane and helicopter manufacturers have been using flat engines for decades. With airplanes I think its helps to keep the nose lower for better visibility. From what I understand a flat engine has less vibration, since the opposing cylinders tend to cancel each other out. This eliminates the need for "balance shafts" and what not.

Horizontal engines also need less oil pressure to operate, since oil never has to flow uphill.




Dave
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-09-2004, 08:58 AM
red95svx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by SVXer95
Not all flat motors are non-interference....



True! Subaru doesn't make any non-interference engines anymore



None that I know of anyway.




Dave
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-09-2004, 09:45 AM
svxsubaru1's Avatar
svxsubaru1 svxsubaru1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 1,020
I thought the EJ20t in the wrx was non interfering.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-09-2004, 09:47 AM
mark10t
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If I remember correctly, an H-6 is the most 'perfectly' balanced engine.

Works for me.

-Mark
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-09-2004, 10:09 AM
red95svx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by svxsubaru1
I thought the EJ20t in the wrx was non interfering.


Nope. From the 2.0 Turbo Service Manual:

"Disengagement of more than three timing belt teeth may result in interference between the valve and piston"



Dave
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-09-2004, 10:18 AM
IggDawg's Avatar
IggDawg IggDawg is offline
0h n0es!
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Marlboro, MA
Posts: 267
Send a message via ICQ to IggDawg Send a message via AIM to IggDawg
I think the EJ25 is interference too. I'd be willing to bet the EZ30 is. it's tough to make a CR close to 11:1 and still have it non-interference.
__________________
IggDawg is cool

-IggDawg

1992 Teal SVX LS-L 160k miles
4.11:1 final drive, K&B dropsprings, ART front rotors, stainless steel brake, aluminum underdrive crank pulley, Kuhmo Ecsta Supra 712's, K&N drop-in filter. Previously owned by Alacrity024. FOR SALE

1994 SVX LSi, Barcelona Red #1659, build date 11/93, 117k miles, RIP
ECUtune stage 1, bead crush, smallcar shift kit, TB bypass, SS brake lines, silencer removed, alternator and grounding wires, Mobil1 @ 117k
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-09-2004, 10:25 AM
alacrity024
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
can't horizontally-opposed engines function upside-down? isn't this one of the draws for aeronautical (wrong word?) uses?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-09-2004, 10:28 AM
SpeedyWRX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I also heard that the boxer engines are subject to piston slap
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-09-2004, 10:31 AM
Chiketkd's Avatar
Chiketkd Chiketkd is offline
Row faster...I hear banjos!!!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 10,334
V-6 & V-8 engines can also have piston slap as well. It's a common problem in SVT Lightnings which have the 5.4L Triton V-8...

-Chike
Quote:
Originally posted by SpeedyWRX
I also heard that the boxer engines are subject to piston slap
__________________
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." - Plato

2013 Cosmic Blue 5spd Evo X GSR
2006 Galaxy Gray 6MT RX-8 (sold)
2006 Steel Gray WRX TR (sold)
1996 Brilliant Red SVX L (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-09-2004, 10:35 AM
svx_commuter's Avatar
svx_commuter svx_commuter is offline
Making tires round, Six now :)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,433
The H-6 engine has lower main bearing loads because the power stroke is counter acted partially by an over lapping power stroke on the other side. This helps keeps the crank in the middle of the bearings.

The V-6 just tries to drive the crank out thru the oil pan.
__________________
May your transmission live forever.
SuperbVehicleXtraordinary
Proud sponsor of a 1992 SVX.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-09-2004, 11:11 AM
red95svx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by alacrity024
can't horizontally-opposed engines function upside-down? isn't this one of the draws for aeronautical (wrong word?) uses?




Sort of. Aviation engines designed for inverted flight have special oil and fuel systems that other airplanes do not have. But the overall horizontal design does do very well with inversion.



Dave
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122