The Subaru SVX World Network   SVX Network Forums
Live Chat!
SVX or Subaru Links
Old Lockers
Photo Post
How-To Documents
Message Archive
SVX Shop Search
IRC users:

Go Back   The Subaru SVX World Network > SVX Main Forums > General SVX Babble

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-07-2014, 06:13 PM
NiftySVX NiftySVX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 836
Send a message via AIM to NiftySVX
FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

I've driven about 40,000 miles on FWD, 45,000 on MPT/ACT-4 and now about 3,000 on VTD in the same exact car.

Since I have been getting a few questions about the real world dynamics and driving experience of the VTD transaxle, I thought I would share my impressions of each stock drive system as I would assume I am the only person to ever have experienced each in the same car. I’m going to try and be as thorough as possible so that the post is useful to everyone who may come across it without having to reference other posts to understand. Keep in mind all three transmissions are identical except for ancillary parts relating to AWD.

FWD:

How it works:

Transmission output flows from the reduction drive gear to the reduction driven gear, which is splined to the front differential pinion shaft. Final drive ratio is 3.70.

What this means:

Front wheel drive only.

The rarest of the SVX drivetrains and for good reason. As a review or two put it, the SVX is “compromised”. The negative effects of having a heavy, 230 hp engine with a relatively deep first gear means that unintentional tire spinning is annoyingly present in first gear. Good tires and using manual 2nd mitigate this, but this increases heat produced in the transmission. I would use 2nd start whenever it was wet or whenever I needed to accelerate quickly (such as a left turn in front of traffic, etc.) Torque steer and bump steer are pretty common. Hard acceleration from a stop requires a firm hand on the wheel to keep it in line. The whole experience of a 2WD SVX seems to illustrate why the car was designed to be AWD to begin with.

MPT/ACT full time AWD

How it works:

Transmission output flows from the reduction drive gear to the reduction driven gear, which is splined to the front differential pinion shaft. A clutch hub is welded onto the reduction driven gear. A piston and special friction discs that are designed to slip are inside a clutch drum which is mated to the rear output shaft. 3.545 FDR.

What this means:

Power is sapped from the reduction drive gear and sent to the rear differential, which is then allocated to each rear wheel via a viscous type LSD. The pressure applied to this clutch is varied via a duty cycle solenoid as some percentage of main line pressure. This process is dynamic and is based on the principle of predictive modeling. Its primary goal is to prevent wheelspin and to mitigate it when it occurs. It is important to note that the front pinion shaft is still directly connected to the reduction driven gear, which is in mesh with the reduction drive gear. It is mechanically impossible for there to be more than 50% power to the rear wheels, nor is it possible for the rear shaft to rotate faster than the front.

Basically a power take off of the front wheel drive unit. In stock and unmodified form, the control unit is conservative with the rear apply pressure due to the fact that binding can and will occur if the rear drive torque gets close to the front torque and the two shafts are turning at different speeds. The bold text above should be kept in mind when thinking of the system, and it is painfully obvious when driving the vehicle. Due to limitations in design and compromises to ensure reliability, this system is almost never “locked” into a full 50/50. This provides for a sure footed vehicle for the most part as the tendency is towards understeer and the open front differential usually causes the torque to the front wheels to be directed to a spinning wheel in a low traction situation. It is quite possible to encounter wheelspin in the front, especially when the engine speed is low. Driving in very low traction situations can be unpredictable due to the fact that one front wheel may be receiving the entire allotted amount of power directed to the front while the rear LSD forces a split. This can cause the tail to swing out unpredictably but this is rare due to the fact that 99% of the time this situation is encountered the transfer clutch is not applying enough torque to the rears to make them both slip. The SVX still torque steers and bump steers due to the front bias.

VTD

How it works:

The reduction drive gear is driven by the forward planetary gears, which in turn drives the reduction driven gear and the front output. The rear planetary gears drive the clutch hub, which drive the clutch plates, which in turn drive the clutch drum that is mated to the rear output shaft along with the rear sun gear. The two sets of planetaries are of different sizes which provide for a rear bias of about 60%. FDR: 3.70

What this means:

Quite simply, it means that the car feels whole. The track problems of the other two systems are gone as there is no imaginable situation where the front wheel torque would be higher than the rear. Torque ratio between front and rear is naturally balanced to where the rears receive more than the front, which is nice as the front wheels are unloaded by weight transfer when accelerating. This gives the car a RWD feel and makes wheelspin very unlikely, even without a clutch. The clutch itself has thinner and less robust clutch plates as it does not have to bear the full brunt of the torque split, instead it must only suppress the differential action. This requires less friction in the clutches and is therefore much, much better at equalizing the two output shaft speeds than a MPT clutch alone could ever hope to be.

In summary, I would like to point out the main advantages of the VTD system

• Mechanical rear bias, power must travel through the planetary gearset to reach the front wheels.
• No more “keeping up with the front shaft speed” objective.
• Additional rear torque is made useful via the rear LSD instead of additional front torque being misused by the open front diff.
• Less force is required to equalize shaft speeds resulting in better operation of the clutch pack.
• SVX suspension seems designed for this rear bias
• 3.70 final drive ratio
• JDM tcu is vastly superior to US tcu.
• More reliable system (no broken transfer clutch hubs here)
• The SVX drives like a proper sports coupe instead of a front wheel biased high power mid 90s legacy.

A final note. The VTD setup used in the SVX is unique to the SVX. There is no other Subaru produced that used identical parts, so sourcing VTD parts from a non-svx donor would require a completely custom TCU using the donor vehicle’s VTD apply maps to prevent binding and provide proper operation.

As usual sorry for the lengthy post, comments, questions, and corrections are always welcome.
__________________
2007 GS 450h-Active Stabilizer/Radar cruise
1994 L Blue 3.70 VTD



ASE Master Automobile
ASE Advanced Level Specialist
Toyota Master Diagnostic Technician (former life)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-07-2014, 07:29 PM
Conn SVX's Avatar
Conn SVX Conn SVX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NW ,Connecticut
Posts: 2,833
Registered SVX
Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

What cars have what? My SVX was converted to a 5 speed WRX Tranny 3:90
What do I have?
__________________
When I was in school I sucked in sports. Then I found out I can buy trophies and now I am great at everything.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-08-2014, 03:00 AM
Tapani Tapani is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 815
Registered SVX
Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

I fully agree with everything Nate said below. The VTD conversion was the best mod so far.

Tapani
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-08-2014, 06:53 AM
SVX_MY_BABY's Avatar
SVX_MY_BABY SVX_MY_BABY is offline
Posting since Dec.'98
Subaru Silver Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: HALIFAX Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,472
Registered SVX
Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

Well. That's pretty nifty I must say.
__________________
Peter
ART Cryogenic/Slotted Rotors, Stainless Steel Brake Lines, PWR Radiator, Tranny cooler, Stebro, Earthworm's Poly Differential/front & rear swaybar bushings, Koni Inserts and Mychailo SVX Sport Springs all 4 corners, Indigo Blue paint. Liquid Silver Wheels.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-08-2014, 06:39 PM
Coan's Avatar
Coan Coan is offline
Alleged User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Savage, MN
Posts: 219
Registered SVX
Thumbs up Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

Great write-up! It's nice to hear it from someone who has driven all three setups.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NiftySVX View Post
The SVX still torque steers and bump steers due to the front bias.
My one comment would be that while torque steer is a side effect of excessive power at the steering wheels, "bump steer" is not affected by drive type. It's entirely due to suspension geometry, and if it's present in an SVX it will be there regardless of drive type.
__________________
Jon

1997 SVX LSi Bordeaux Pearl
1995 SVX L AWD Polo Green - 277k miles
1986 Pontiac Fiero 3.4L Twin Dual Cam V6

Last edited by Coan; 07-08-2014 at 06:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-08-2014, 07:55 PM
NiftySVX NiftySVX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 836
Send a message via AIM to NiftySVX
Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coan View Post
My one comment would be that while torque steer is a side effect of excessive power at the steering wheels, "bump steer" is not affected by drive type. It's entirely due to suspension geometry, and if it's present in an SVX it will be there regardless of drive type.
The phenomenon which I am describing is the tendency of the front wheels to pull the vehicle in directions as the front wheels go over bumps. This phenomenon is eliminated in the VTD setup as far as I can tell. It is one of the most annoying FWD tendencies.

In any case, my point is that the car tracks much better. It seems that the geometry of the rear suspension is well suited to handling more than half of the torque, and the car really "feels" more like it is going where you point it instead of going where the front wheels are pulling it. It is difficult to describe.

As for which models had what:

All US models were 3.545 full time active MPT based AWD (ACT-4) EXCEPT:

1994 LE, L, LS models
1995 L models WITHOUT Active safety group option

JDM and AUS cars are VTD, along with some other regions. I believe germany got the ACT-4 where much of the UK got the VTD. Someone feel free to chime in here that knows the exact regions. The AUS VTD trans uses a different TCU and an internally mounted speed sensor no. 2. I believe one or two have modified it to work with the external unit.
__________________
2007 GS 450h-Active Stabilizer/Radar cruise
1994 L Blue 3.70 VTD



ASE Master Automobile
ASE Advanced Level Specialist
Toyota Master Diagnostic Technician (former life)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-09-2014, 10:26 AM
spinn360's Avatar
spinn360 spinn360 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Redmond, OR
Posts: 355
Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

Having driven a few motorcycles bump steering (for motorcycles) is something completely different than going over a bump... I know off topic, and unnecessary but I felt like inputting. Good post!
__________________
1989 Subaru XT6 130k
1992 Subaru SVX 120k

1993 Ford Probe 30mpg 213k
1989 Subaru XT6 150k
All good and running
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-09-2014, 10:55 AM
Coan's Avatar
Coan Coan is offline
Alleged User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Savage, MN
Posts: 219
Registered SVX
Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

Quote:
Originally Posted by spinn360 View Post
Having driven a few motorcycles bump steering (for motorcycles) is something completely different than going over a bump... I know off topic, and unnecessary but I felt like inputting. Good post!
Bump steer is defined as a change in toe as the suspension moves throughout it's range of motion. It has to do with the location and length of the tie rod in relation to the control arm(s). Excessive bump steer can cause unpredictable and unstable handling, especially over rough terrain.

Sorry for derailing your thread, back on topic!
__________________
Jon

1997 SVX LSi Bordeaux Pearl
1995 SVX L AWD Polo Green - 277k miles
1986 Pontiac Fiero 3.4L Twin Dual Cam V6
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-10-2014, 09:06 AM
SVXRide's Avatar
SVXRide SVXRide is offline
Official AutoX Part Breaker
Subaru Gold Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Midlothian, VA 23112
Posts: 8,138
Registered SVX
Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

So, are you saying that the 4HEAT in USDM '94 SVXi and '95 L models without ABS all had 3.70 gear sets and the VTD setup? Up to now, I was under the impression that you had to source a 4HEAT from Japan or Australia to get VTD.
Thanks
Bill


Quote:
Originally Posted by NiftySVX View Post
The phenomenon which I am describing is the tendency of the front wheels to pull the vehicle in directions as the front wheels go over bumps. This phenomenon is eliminated in the VTD setup as far as I can tell. It is one of the most annoying FWD tendencies.

In any case, my point is that the car tracks much better. It seems that the geometry of the rear suspension is well suited to handling more than half of the torque, and the car really "feels" more like it is going where you point it instead of going where the front wheels are pulling it. It is difficult to describe.

As for which models had what:

All US models were 3.545 full time active MPT based AWD (ACT-4) EXCEPT:

1994 LE, L, LS models
1995 L models WITHOUT Active safety group option

JDM and AUS cars are VTD, along with some other regions. I believe germany got the ACT-4 where much of the UK got the VTD. Someone feel free to chime in here that knows the exact regions. The AUS VTD trans uses a different TCU and an internally mounted speed sensor no. 2. I believe one or two have modified it to work with the external unit.
__________________
Retired NASA Rocket Scientist

Most famous NASA "Child" - OSIRIS-REx delivered samples from asteroid BENNU to Earth in Sept. 2023

Center Network Member #989

'92 Fully caged, 5 speed, waiting for its fully built EG33
'92 "Test Mule", 4:44 Auto, JDM 4:44 Rear Diff with Mech LSD, Tuned headers, Full one-off suspension
'92(?) Laguna, 6 spd and other stuff (still at OT's place)
My Locker
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-10-2014, 01:33 PM
1986nate 1986nate is offline
Senior Member
Subaru Silver Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meadville, PA-but I'll still travel
Posts: 4,672
Registered SVX
Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVXRide View Post
So, are you saying that the 4HEAT in USDM '94 SVXi and '95 L models without ABS all had 3.70 gear sets and the VTD setup? Up to now, I was under the impression that you had to source a 4HEAT from Japan or Australia to get VTD.
Thanks
Bill
Bill, those are FWD models....
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-10-2014, 05:41 PM
SVXRide's Avatar
SVXRide SVXRide is offline
Official AutoX Part Breaker
Subaru Gold Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Midlothian, VA 23112
Posts: 8,138
Registered SVX
Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1986nate View Post
Bill, those are FWD models....
Nate,
Thus my confusion
So, my belief that the only way you can get a AWD VTD is by sourcing a JDM or Australian 4HEAT is correct?
Bill
__________________
Retired NASA Rocket Scientist

Most famous NASA "Child" - OSIRIS-REx delivered samples from asteroid BENNU to Earth in Sept. 2023

Center Network Member #989

'92 Fully caged, 5 speed, waiting for its fully built EG33
'92 "Test Mule", 4:44 Auto, JDM 4:44 Rear Diff with Mech LSD, Tuned headers, Full one-off suspension
'92(?) Laguna, 6 spd and other stuff (still at OT's place)
My Locker
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-10-2014, 08:38 PM
1986nate 1986nate is offline
Senior Member
Subaru Silver Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meadville, PA-but I'll still travel
Posts: 4,672
Registered SVX
Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVXRide View Post
Nate,
Thus my confusion
So, my belief that the only way you can get a AWD VTD is by sourcing a JDM or Australian 4HEAT is correct?
Bill
or UK, and possibly a couple other limited markets. Also, the designation is 4EAT, not 4HEAT

You also need the matching TCU for the same year range car as they changed the C solenoid signal around 95.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-13-2014, 12:24 AM
odepaj's Avatar
odepaj odepaj is offline
Killer of threads
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,926
Registered SVX
Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

Is it possible to use the VTD center diff/portion with a different transmission, say a 4.44?
__________________
-Dustin

1992 Ebony LS-L w/191k miles Mods: a few and acouple more

1995 Brilliant Red L/AWD w/154k miles Mods: Stebro catback exhaust, K&N drop in filter, ECUtune ST1v5, 4.44, lots of JDM goodies

1992 Pearly LS-L w/154k miles Sold Mods: 4.11, rust

2008 DGM Legacy spec.B w/245k miles Mods: Cryotune Stage3, VF52, bushings galore, STi pink springs, Bilstein HDs


My Locker

The only man alive who drives three "Subu SVS's".......according to my insurance company
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-13-2014, 03:51 AM
Tapani Tapani is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 815
Registered SVX
Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions

Quote:
Originally Posted by odepaj View Post
Is it possible to use the VTD center diff/portion with a different transmission, say a 4.44?
Yes, but you will need a chip with modified JDM firmware in the TCU.

A USM car is the easiest candidate.

/T
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122