SVX Network Forums Live Chat! SVX or Subaru Links Old Lockers Photo Post How-To Documents Message Archive SVX Shop Search |
IRC users: |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Undeserved reputation for unreliability?
Over the years there have been many many comments made on this board and elsewhere that suggest that the SVX is an unreliable vehicle – one that, while fun to drive, perhaps should not be relied upon as one’s primary mode of transportation. That reputation is so widespread that in 2003, before I bought my first one, I was warned against buying an SVX that was for sale at a local Subaru dealership. It was a salesman who worked there that warned me.
Well, I bought one anyway. Now I have 4 of them. My wife and I and our two sons each have one for a daily driver. I’m guessing that between them we put 30 to 40 thousand miles on them each year. Collectively, we’ve driven SVXs for an estimated 100 thousand miles. To date, the following is all that I’ve had to do, other than routine maintenance: Power steering hose (two cars); Real wheel bearings (one car and those bearings were worn when I bought the car); Coil pack (one car); Steady bearing in rear drive shaft; and Heater core replacement (one car). This doesn’t include minor problems like cruise control repair consisting of reattaching the vacuum hose, automatic seatbelt track cleaning and lubrication and O2 sensor replacement. Two of my cars have 5-speeds which have given me no problems at all. The other two still have the stock automatic transmissions. I’ve installed a transmission cooler and in-line filter in the first one I bought (over 4 years ago) and have had no problems at all with it. The other automatic, which I bought only a few months ago, will soon get a cooler and filter too. I don’t consider any of these difficulties to be unusual for 15-year-old cars with close to 600 thousand miles between them. Despite having been warned about the maintenance requirements and expense associated with SVX ownership, I’ve found them to be very dependable and I don’t think they deserve their bad reputation. And no – I’m not going to knock on wood – I don’t think I have to. Last edited by bcpianoman; 11-04-2007 at 12:02 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Some folks get good service out of their Yugo. Go figure. Few cars in the modern era deserve an overall poor service rating. Some are much better than others but you can find good ones in each brand. I'm with you. My SVX was virtually trouble-free, far and away the best overall car I have ever owned. I give it that rating not simply because it was trouble-free, but due to its fun-to-drive and unique-to-own factors as well. If you start with a good SVX and maintain it properly, it should be as reliable as any other car on the market, maybe more so.
Preston |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with the first post. I have had 3 SVX's and they have all been great cars.
__________________
Former: 1994 Barcelona Red(x2), 1995 Brilliant Red, 1992 Liquid Silver, 1992 Ebony(x2), 1992 Pearl White (x2) Current: 2017 Ford Raptor 2017 Kawasaki KLR 1995 Guards Red Carrera 1995 Spec-ish Miata - track car 1957 CJ-5 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
A well maintained SVX is as reliable as any car you're going to find. Things rarely "just break" on these cars, except for maybe the plastic rad tanks and a couple misc items. A poorly maintained SVX however, could be a different story.
__________________
Chris 92 Ebony Mica LS-L "A Rolling Restoration": 223,250 KM - Sleeping 2007 STi 6MT, Stance GR+ coilovers, PWR Rad, JDM hood badge, svxfiles 6000K HIDs, JDM Clear Corners, $15/15 min mod, $20/20 min mod, Energy Swaybar Bushings, Hella Supertones horns, Gold STi BBS rims, Group A lightweight crank pulley, A/C system removed, Custom header-back exhaust, Hybrid carbon/metal rear sway bar, restored headlights with CCFL halos 2008 Subaru Legacy Spec B - Diamond Grey Metallic - Sold 2020 Ram 1500 Longhorn - Red Pearl |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
It isn't unreliable. In fact every year it, the mita, the non-turbo z and the supra of its day were the only sports cars listed by Consumer reports as being recommended (based mostly on reliablity as reported by owners). Issue is its an EXPENSIVE car to upkeep properly (which upkeep is what keeps it reliable). Then you bring in the lack of resale value for 'em the car is barely worth its annual maint. if you're in the 60k or 120k service years.
Try driving a 92 Corvette 100k without being religious about its maint! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
IMO, it's not that they're unreliable, but when something goes wrong it's just hard to find someone that knows enough about them to fix them. Even so, I'm keeping mine and probably will for a long time.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
One thing you have to keep in mind is that the SVX was a radically new design in 92 for Subaru.
Any new model will experience growing pains and the SVX is no different. With no major changes for 5 years ... and being daily driver cars for over 15 years ... I'd say the SVX is in the reliable class. Not many cars in it's class can boast that.
__________________
92 SVX LS Pearl 94 SVX LSi Barcelona Red 82 Brat 4WD Bob |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I agree it is a huge ordeal on finding a good mechanic that knows our cars , I ended taking mine to the steelership, AND ONLY 1 tech knew about the car!! so when he went on vacation for a month I prayed it didnt break down it didnt and I have now driven it for 2.5 years w/o any problems (knock on wood ) you just gotta have the $$ for the maint.
__________________
William |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Doubly agreed on this point, as it was the point I was going to make.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I would also add that if someone drives it like it was stolen, you will develop many problems that the average driver doesn't have often. If you treat it with respect, it will treat you right. If not, you will be paying and paying and paying ...
__________________
. Earl .... ... .... ><SVX(*> Subaru Ambassador [COLOR=”silver”]1992 Tri Color L[/COLOR] ~45K (06/91) #2430 1992 Dark Teal LS-L ~184K (05/91) #0739 1992 Claret LS-L ~196K (05/91) #0831 1992 Pearl LS-L ~103K (06/91) #1680 1992 Pearl LS-L ~151K (06/91) #2229 1992 Dark Teal LS ~150K (07/91) #3098 (parts car) 1992 White LS-L ~139K (08/92) #6913 1993 25th AE ~98K (02/93) #164 1993 25th AE ~58K (02/93) #176 1993 25th AE ~107K (02/93) #215 1993 25th AE ~162K (02/93) #223 1994 Laguna Blue Pearl LSi ~124K (1/94) #2408 1994 Laguna Blue Pearl LSi ~144K (10/93) #1484 1994 Laguna Blue Pearl LSi ~68K (10/93) #1525 1994 Barcelona Red LSi ~46K (02/94) #2624 1994 Pearl LSi ~41K (12/93) #1961 1995 Bordeaux Pearl LSi ~70K (02/95) #855 1996 Polo Green LSi ~95K (03/96) #872 1997 Bordeaux Pearl LSi ~55K (08/96) #097 2003 Brilliant Red LS1 Convertible ~29K (04/03) #8951 1999 Magnetic Red LS1 Coupe ~33K (04/99) #6420 My Email | Old Locker | New Locker | Picture of 15 of the 19 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
I'm one of the people who drove it like it's stolen.
Tranny has been the only major issue due to that. Everything else is regular maintenance. If you ask the right people, you'll find plenty of new cars having plenty of problems the SVX does not have. I know a guy with a Mazda 6, the tranny has been replaced or fixed 3 times in 3 years.
__________________
"That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." '92 Dark Teal SVX LS-L, >146,000m 3 pedals, 5 speeds., restoration underway. 2012 Honda Insight, slow but cute. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Something my dad taught me, back when I was riding BMX: "The harder you ride it, the harder you have to take care of it" This holds true of almost every car I've ever owned.
Subarus are reliable in general, but expensive to repair when they do break. The SVX is no exception. Although if you have to send it to a shop, almost no-one knows anything about these cars. This leads to even more expense. Thank goodness I can do most of my own work.
__________________
[SIGPIC]http://www.subaru-svx.net/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=5569&dateline=1207440 507[/SIGPIC] Naught but by the grace of God "42" Current Stable By Age:'89 Subaru XT6 Silver "Audrey" as in Hepburn '96 SVX LSi #767Brilliant Red "Lil Red" Now on the front burner. Looking for a totalled, but running parts car. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I have pointed out all that is being said here many times. My SVX has been 100% reliable as a daily driver.
I do not understand all the problems with mechanics regarding the car as a complete oddball. It is a bloody motor car for goodness sake. Kiwi mechanics are in no way frightened by it.
__________________
Trevor, New Zealand. As a child, on cold mornings I gladly stood in cowpats to warm my bare feet, but I detest bull$hit! |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
It is somewhat of a oddball. Not to many cars in the US have a flat 6.
I can only think of 2 at the moment. Most mechs are used to working on in-line 4/6's, V6/V8's. When they see a flat/boxer engine, most start having a tizzy and are scared to work on them. My DD has 203K on it, so the PO must have done something right (except for not installing a tranny cooler, which is now fixed). Good preventitive maintenance is the key to making any car last. Unless it was a poorly designed POS to begin with
__________________
Prime Сasual Dating |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
My Claret is nearing 170k and has never let me down, because the maintenance on it has always been done properly, and I have every record since it was new.
As for other SVXs Ive owned, a few of them have been cases of me trying to undo years of neglect. I will testify that the SVX is a reliable, safe, and sturdy vehicle built for the long run.
__________________
1991 SVX L JDM |
|
|