The Subaru SVX World Network   SVX Network Forums
Live Chat!
SVX or Subaru Links
Old Lockers
Photo Post
How-To Documents
Message Archive
SVX Shop Search
IRC users:

Go Back   The Subaru SVX World Network > SVX Main Forums > General SVX Babble

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2009, 05:37 AM
glaze148 glaze148 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: marin county, ca
Posts: 103
Considering new, Subaru

Not sure if it's appropriate to post here with this question?
Considering leasing a new car.{Keeping my 92 lsl touring}
Anyone have experience with these
Legacy
Forester
Tested the Legacy, and liked it except that it was VERY noisy. Rented one, and drove 100 city miles. Very poor gas mileage.
Please list pro's and cons for each model if you can.
Thanks A Lot
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2009, 07:17 AM
Joel's Avatar
Joel Joel is offline
Joel
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 22
Re: Considering new, Subaru

Not sure if this will help you since your looking at new vehicles, but I might be able to provide a little insight. I have an 06 Forester and 06 Outback. Style wise, the new Forester looks completely different inside and out from my 06. Drivetrain wise, little change. The Outback/Legacy, on the other hand, is mostly the same, the front grille is a little different and the taillights I think. Both use the same standard engine, 2.5, 174 hp 4cyl with 5spd or 4spd sportshift automatic. With the Forester, you can upgraded to the XT Turbo and about 224 hp. I've never driven one, but have written the turbo transforms the vehicle, performance wise. For city driving, the 2.5 is a great performer all around, but when accelerating into traffic, passing at say 50 to 70, you really have to push it to get going. Add people and cargo, and it will be worse. The biggest drawback to the XT is premium gas is a must, of course. Same base engine/trans for the Outback, but the option engines are the 2.5 Turbo and 3.0 6cyl, the turbo standard with a 5spd manual or optional 5spd sportshift automatic. The 3.0 standard with the 5spd sportshift auto. The 3.0 is 250 hp in my 06, it may be 245hp in the 09's. Almost identical hp to the 2.5 turbo (243), but with no turbo lag. This engine, too, requires premium. This engine is silky smooth, and it is mated to a 5spd sportshift automatic. The standard 2.5 and 3.0 seem to be in the 21-22 and 18-21 mpg ranges in my normal driving. Just like the commercials, how you drive and where, etc, will determine where you end up number wise. I like power, so I'll probably never go with the standard engine again. The 3.0 is (my opinion) my much more refined, better performer all the way around. It's quiet and smooth. Really, very different from my Forester. You can feel it suspension wise, better shocks, etc. The old saying, "you get what you pay for" is true, you'll pay to get into the turbo and 3.0 models, upper $20's to low $30's, so if you on a budget the 2.5i models with the standard engines for both vehicles are where you will be. With almost a $10K difference in price, you'll surely feel a difference in ride and performance from the base 2.5I to the 3.0R. On Subaru.com, you can look at the brochures from current models back to 2005 I think. You can easily compare the performance numbers, weight, etc there. They are in PDF form. If you are looking for SVX type of performace, the turbo in either the Forester or Legacy or the 3.0 in the Legacy are the ways to go! Hoped that helped!

Last edited by Joel; 02-28-2009 at 07:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2009, 07:21 AM
dcarrb dcarrb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: none
Posts: 3,430
Re: Considering new, Subaru

I've ridden in newer Subarus but not driven one, and conclude I've been spoiled by the SVX and anything else will be a letdown.

dcb
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2009, 07:24 AM
Subie59's Avatar
Subie59 Subie59 is offline
94 SVX LSI Teal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada near Toronto
Posts: 415
Registered SVX
Re: Considering new, Subaru

I have driven older Legacys for quite some time. I have owned a 1996 Legacy wagon (excellent car) still own a 97 legacy wagon and a 2001 Gt ltd. absolutely no problems to speak of with these cars.... highly recommend a Legacy. But foresters are very popular. Can't help but think you are paying for the popularity factor of the Forester....
__________________
94 SVX LSI
2001 LegacyGT (daughter's ride now)
2005 Legacy outback XT (wife's car)
all stock and likely staying that way for now
1981 Datsun 280zxturbo summer toy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-28-2009, 09:55 AM
apocalixto's Avatar
apocalixto apocalixto is offline
do da stanky leggggg!
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 132
Send a message via AIM to apocalixto
Re: Considering new, Subaru

I actually went to the dealership here in Dallas not too long ago (when I was buying parts for my...now useless...head gasket job) and test drove each of the new Subarus...even an STi. I think that the new legacy really does drive well, but honestly all subarus have road noise IMO. If i had to pick a new Subaru though, I would probably go with the new WRX sedan. it is sporty, quick, interior isn't too "in your face" and it is not dreadfully expensive (for a new car). The new outbacks are alright, just not personally a fan of wagons, hence, not suggesting an STi suggesting a WRX SEDAN!
Really, I had no complaints with the new subaru line up, except the STi being a wagon now. haha
__________________
My SVX
94 Bordeaux Pearl LS

MB Quart components and 6x9s, Autotek "Mean Machine" Amplifier, Pioneer D3 Touch Screen Nav/DVD/CD/iPod, 4 10" PowerBass 2XL Subs, Powerbass XA-3000D Monoblock Amp
Flowmaster exhaust, MP 6000K HID w/ clear lenses and '97 style grille, Carbon Fiber Hood w/ scoop (recently painted), 17" Sport Max rims (gunmetal w/ chrome lip), Ground Control Coilovers, Motorsport Crank Pulley, and Green Filter, ARP head studs, GroupN Engine mounts
4.44 AWD swap w/ Quick Change
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2009, 10:49 AM
shelfy's Avatar
shelfy shelfy is offline
I have a problem. :(
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 8,485
Send a message via AIM to shelfy Send a message via Yahoo to shelfy
Registered SVX
Re: Considering new, Subaru

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joel View Post
Not sure if this will help you since your looking at new vehicles, but I might be able to provide a little insight. I have an 06 Forester and 06 Outback. Style wise, the new Forester looks completely different inside and out from my 06. Drivetrain wise, little change. The Outback/Legacy, on the other hand, is mostly the same, the front grille is a little different and the taillights I think. Both use the same standard engine, 2.5, 174 hp 4cyl with 5spd or 4spd sportshift automatic. With the Forester, you can upgraded to the XT Turbo and about 224 hp. I've never driven one, but have written the turbo transforms the vehicle, performance wise. For city driving, the 2.5 is a great performer all around, but when accelerating into traffic, passing at say 50 to 70, you really have to push it to get going. Add people and cargo, and it will be worse. The biggest drawback to the XT is premium gas is a must, of course. Same base engine/trans for the Outback, but the option engines are the 2.5 Turbo and 3.0 6cyl, the turbo standard with a 5spd manual or optional 5spd sportshift automatic. The 3.0 standard with the 5spd sportshift auto. The 3.0 is 250 hp in my 06, it may be 245hp in the 09's. Almost identical hp to the 2.5 turbo (243), but with no turbo lag. This engine, too, requires premium. This engine is silky smooth, and it is mated to a 5spd sportshift automatic. The standard 2.5 and 3.0 seem to be in the 21-22 and 18-21 mpg ranges in my normal driving. Just like the commercials, how you drive and where, etc, will determine where you end up number wise. I like power, so I'll probably never go with the standard engine again. The 3.0 is (my opinion) my much more refined, better performer all the way around. It's quiet and smooth. Really, very different from my Forester. You can feel it suspension wise, better shocks, etc. The old saying, "you get what you pay for" is true, you'll pay to get into the turbo and 3.0 models, upper $20's to low $30's, so if you on a budget the 2.5i models with the standard engines for both vehicles are where you will be. With almost a $10K difference in price, you'll surely feel a difference in ride and performance from the base 2.5I to the 3.0R. On Subaru.com, you can look at the brochures from current models back to 2005 I think. You can easily compare the performance numbers, weight, etc there. They are in PDF form. If you are looking for SVX type of performace, the turbo in either the Forester or Legacy or the 3.0 in the Legacy are the ways to go! Hoped that helped!
uhhh...the outback is available with the turbo 2.5L as well. 2.5XT.
__________________
Kenneth

1997 Subaru SVX LSi "Svetlana" #185 of 640 - 09/1996 - Polo Green Pearl - 34k miles

1992 Subaru SVX LS-L "Everett" #8738 - 01/1992 - Ebony Pearl - 139k miles - 5MT shifty - Sold 07/31/2011

1992 Subaru SVX LS-L "Sven" #1599 - 05/1991 - Claret - 168k miles - Traded 05/11/2005


2023 Subaru Crosstrek Limited CVT - Crystal White Pearl - 2.8k miles
2021 Subaru Forester 2.5i Limited CVT - Horizon Blue Pearl - 17k miles
2023 Volkswagen Jetta S 6MT - Pure White - 2.6k miles
2020 Hyundai Ioniq Limited EV - Ceramic White - 30k miles
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-28-2009, 12:05 PM
Joel's Avatar
Joel Joel is offline
Joel
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 22
Re: Considering new, Subaru

Quote:
Originally Posted by shelfy View Post
uhhh...the outback is available with the turbo 2.5L as well. 2.5XT.
"Same base engine/trans for the Outback, but the option engines are the 2.5 Turbo and 3.0 6cyl, the turbo standard with a 5spd manual or optional 5spd sportshift automatic."

Sorry, forgot to put "XT" after 2.5

Legacy 2.5i (base 2.5, 170 hp)
Legacy 2.5i Special Edition (base 2.5, 170 hp)
Legacy 2.5i Limited (base 2.5, 170 hp)
Legacy 2.5GT (2.5 Turbo, 243 hp)
Legacy 2.5GT (2.5 Turbo, 243 hp)
Legacy 3.0R (6, 245hp)
Legacy 3.0R Limited (6, 245hp)

Forester 2.5X (base 2.5, 170 hp)
Forester 2.5X Premium (base 2.5, 170 hp)
Forester 2.5X Limited (base 2.5, 170 hp)
Forester 2.5XT (2.5 Turbo, 224 hp )
Forester 2.5XT Limited (2.5 Turbo, 224 hp)

Outback 2.5i (base 2.5, 170 hp)
Outback 2.5i Special Edition (base 2.5, 170 hp)
Outback 2.5i Limited (base 2.5, 170 hp)
Outback 2.5XT Limited (2.5 Turbo, 243 hp)
Outback 3.0R Limited (6, 245hp)

Last edited by Joel; 02-28-2009 at 12:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2009, 12:16 PM
glaze148 glaze148 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: marin county, ca
Posts: 103
Re: Considering new, Subaru

Thanks everyone. The comment that all Subaru's have a lot of road noise concerns me. The new Legacy sedan was REALLY loud.
I really have a problem with that trait
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-28-2009, 12:43 PM
kwren's Avatar
kwren kwren is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: washington state
Posts: 3,499
Re: Considering new, Subaru

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcarrb View Post
I've ridden in newer Subarus but not driven one, and conclude I've been spoiled by the SVX and anything else will be a letdown.

dcb
Soooooooo TRUE!

Keith
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122