The Subaru SVX World Network   SVX Network Forums
Live Chat!
SVX or Subaru Links
Old Lockers
Photo Post
How-To Documents
Message Archive
SVX Shop Search
IRC users:

Go Back   The Subaru SVX World Network > SVX Main Forums > Technical Q & A

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-20-2001, 08:33 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Exhaust System Backpressure

I am possibly going to buy a late model SVX next year and, from researching the car, it seems to be the general opinion that the performance of post-93 cars was down compared with the 92/93 versions (although I've seen posts which appear to contradict this). The general opinion seems to be that Subaru "de-tuned" the tranny for post 93s, however, I recently came across a theory which I had not heard before (maybe it's common knowledge and I'm just not aware of it - if so, sorry for wasting everyone's time).

My source was the Shop Foreman at a local Toyota dealership where they also service Subarus (two dealerships both owned by the same person). He was quite adamant that Subaru had modified the exhaust system to make it more restrictive to increase backpressure and allow them to lean out the engine to F/A ratios of 15 or 16 (maybe to help mileage or help pass emissions??). He cited the case of an SVX owner whose exhaust system they had replaced with a "conventional" system (ie. not a performance exhaust, but not too restrictive). The tone was much more aggressive as the car drove away and, when the owner returned a few days later he was ecstatic and swore that the car had gained 25 or 30 HP.

I'll admit that this is purely anecdotal evidence, but my experience is that putting a performance exhaust on a normally aspirated engine does not make much of a difference to the perceived power (a turbo, though, is a different story . I remember reading that most people cannot perceive anything less than a 5% power increase.

To a first approximation you'd have to drop HP from 230 to about 195 to give the sort of change which Motor Trend saw in 0 to 60 time and 1/4 mile speed between the 94 and the 92. This seems to fit with what the SVX owner reported.

Has anyone else come across this theory?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-21-2001, 08:55 AM
cocacola08's Avatar
cocacola08 cocacola08 is offline
This account is scheduled to be deleted for inactivity
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 943
Send a message via ICQ to cocacola08 Send a message via AIM to cocacola08 Send a message via Yahoo to cocacola08
When I put a cat-back system on my car, I noticed a great difference in performance. My best 1/4mi b4 was a 16.4, after was a 15.8
__________________
Kev
kevin.m.sheets@verizon.net
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122