The Subaru SVX World Network   SVX Network Forums
Live Chat!
SVX or Subaru Links
Old Lockers
Photo Post
How-To Documents
Message Archive
SVX Shop Search
IRC users:

Go Back   The Subaru SVX World Network > SVX Main Forums > Technical Q & A

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 06-24-2008, 10:43 PM
NikFu S.'s Avatar
NikFu S. NikFu S. is offline
Takin tools to task
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: A-town, Alaska
Posts: 7,280
Send a message via MSN to NikFu S.
Registered SVX
Re: Accusation and Explanation of the QC, for all to see.

I have no interest in the deciding of what could be called a victor to this e-duel, nor do I find it entertaining or even pleasurable to read.

I do however feel it is necessary we let it come to a natural close either through persuasion or dissuasion, but not instigation or invasion.
__________________
"That which can be asserted without evidence
can be dismissed without evidence."


'92 Dark Teal SVX LS-L, >146,000m
3 pedals, 5 speeds., restoration underway.
2012 Honda Insight, slow but cute.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-25-2008, 05:07 AM
Manarius's Avatar
Manarius Manarius is offline
1995 Subaru SVX LSi Polo Green
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Grantham, PA (Near Harrisburg)
Posts: 2,119
Send a message via ICQ to Manarius Send a message via AIM to Manarius Send a message via MSN to Manarius Send a message via Yahoo to Manarius Send a message via Skype™ to Manarius
Registered SVX
Re: Accusation and Explanation of the QC, for all to see.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor View Post
My thread, "Trevor's Posts" as I recall was the title, has been deleted without explanation. As I recall this thread also included evidence, as it contained a statement by me which was deliberately misconstrued, so as to label me a liar. Not to mention controversial posts by you.

Again I note, that I am instructed to take head, by way of a threat. Happy place this.
So Trevor, can I perhaps simplify this so that readers can understand? You can correct me if I paraphrase incorrectly.

You're saying that:
1. Harvey didn't really design the quick shift technology, but borrowed it (or pieces) from someone else's design.

2. The quick shift technology, which Harvey says is "better and easier" on the transmission is actually not due to varying the Solenoid A line pressure.

I think it would better for all of us if it was clear what exactly the accusations are.
__________________
-Jason
(8/23/07-Present) 1995 Subaru SVX LSi (197k) Polo Green (#1102) 03/95
Mods: DDM Tuning 4500k 35w Low Beam HID, 100w H3 Bulbs, Extra Ground Cables, 15 minute $12.96 mod,
svxfiles designed transmission mount (), sporting a "new" tail light bar,
silver BBS rims, custom power steering cooler (one that doesn't dump ATF constantly), new negative lead cable, no more third or fourth gear
(1977-Present) 1977 Chevrolet Corvette (81k) Silver
(12/01/2011-Present) 2005 Subaru Outback 2.5i Limited 5MT (97k)
I have a bad feeling about this.
-Obi Wan Kenobi
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-25-2008, 11:05 AM
SVXRide's Avatar
SVXRide SVXRide is offline
Official AutoX Part Breaker
Subaru Gold Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Midlothian, VA 23112
Posts: 8,138
Registered SVX
Re: Accusation and Explanation of the QC, for all to see.



-Bill
__________________
Retired NASA Rocket Scientist

Most famous NASA "Child" - OSIRIS-REx delivered samples from asteroid BENNU to Earth in Sept. 2023

Center Network Member #989

'92 Fully caged, 5 speed, waiting for its fully built EG33
'92 "Test Mule", 4:44 Auto, JDM 4:44 Rear Diff with Mech LSD, Tuned headers, Full one-off suspension
'92(?) Laguna, 6 spd and other stuff (still at OT's place)
My Locker
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-25-2008, 06:50 PM
Trevor's Avatar
Trevor Trevor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 5,223
Registered SVX
Re: Accusation and Explanation of the QC, for all to see.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manarius View Post
So Trevor, can I perhaps simplify this so that readers can understand? You can correct me if I paraphrase incorrectly.

You're saying that:
1. Harvey didn't really design the quick shift technology, but borrowed it (or pieces) from someone else's design.

2. The quick shift technology, which Harvey says is "better and easier" on the transmission is actually not due to varying the Solenoid A line pressure.

I think it would better for all of us if it was clear what exactly the accusations are.
I see that you wish to nail me to the wall in respect of what I have stated. Unlike much of my opposition, I do not dodge issues and gladly answer you accordingly.

1. Another's design has been used and adapted quite simply, to perform the desired functions.

2. YES. (N.B. There has been no evidence presented showing that line pressure is varied as a result of modifying the PWM signal to solenoid A. Everything indicates that the control signal is simply reduced, to a level whereby it is no longer effective.)

My object is not to accuse, but rather to ensure that in the interest of members, all information presented here is in fact correct. It would be helpful if the other parties involved, were similarly as honest and direct as I have been with this reply.
__________________
Trevor, New Zealand.

As a child, on cold mornings I gladly stood in cowpats to warm my bare feet, but I detest bull$hit!

Last edited by Trevor; 06-25-2008 at 06:53 PM. Reason: Typo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122