The Subaru SVX World Network   SVX Network Forums
Live Chat!
SVX or Subaru Links
Old Lockers
Photo Post
How-To Documents
Message Archive
SVX Shop Search
IRC users:

Go Back   The Subaru SVX World Network > SVX Main Forums > Technical Q & A

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2004, 12:23 PM
MoreIBNR MoreIBNR is offline
Original Owner 1992-2008
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 367
Send a message via AIM to MoreIBNR
Failed Emissions

I just failed NJ Emissions testing. HC = 158, CO% = 4.21.

I ran the diagnostics and got codes 33 (Vehicle Speed Sensor 2), 37 LH O2 Sensor, and 51 (Neutral Switch).

I don't think the latter would affect emissions.

My question is: Should I take the car to an expert, or what are my chances that I will fix the problem by just replacing the Vehicle Speed Sensor ($142) and the O2 sensors ($91 each)? I would hate to take th ecar in, have the mechanic replace these (charging full retail price which would be +$100) and hit me with a labor charge of $100-200.

I should mention that I have 160.000 miles on the car and it is a 1992. Gas mileage has been pretty poor lately also.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-07-2004, 12:50 PM
red95svx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Without a doubt replace the O2 sensor. A faulty O2 will throw off your emissions and mileage. A good throttle body cleaning wouldn't hurt either.




Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-07-2004, 01:05 PM
n00b on demand's Avatar
n00b on demand n00b on demand is offline
OMGWTFBBQ!!1!11!LMAOROFLC OPTER
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,114
New O2 sensors will improve emissions and will do wonders for your gas mileage as well. I need to do the same to my car but havent gotten that trust check engine light yet
__________________
1993 25th Anniversary Edition # 156 of 301 ~ 121, 488 miles ( SOLD TO svxfiles 8/6/06)

2006 Subaru Impreza 2.5i....5spd - My daily driver

2006 Subaru Legacy 2.5i -7k miles..Mom's daily driver

2,543 Member of the SVX World Network
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-07-2004, 02:20 PM
gsodonis's Avatar
gsodonis gsodonis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 614
O2 sensors

By all means, replace the sensors. When an O2 sensor fails, the ECU will default to a rich condition. Rich = unburned gas = unburned Hydrocarbons = high %HC on an emissions test.

ECU's default to rich because lean conditions can cause engine failure. Rich conditions, although rough on gas mileage, normally don't damage an engine. Overly rich can cause the washing of lubricant from cylinder walls eventually leading to premature ring and cylinder wear and failure from loss of compression, but that's outside of the normal failsafe programmed into a stock ECU. You'll see that more often on improperly tuned forced induction engines, not NA engines. Forgive the topic digression.

You can get brand new Walker direct fit O2 sensors for around $65 each from www.oxygensensors.com
Bosch and Densos are more expensive, but IMHO, functionally, they're all the same.
I replaced mine (along with some exhaust work) and my mileage increased from 21 MPG combined 80% hwy/20% city to around 24 MPG. I have a 5 speed with 4.11 gearing too. In pure highway driving averaging 80 MPH, I get a solid 27 MPG.

Replace your O2 sensors (and any other failed sensor) and retry the emissions test. You'll more than likely pass (unless your catalytic converter is shot, but that's another topic) and your mileage will increase as a result.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-07-2004, 02:46 PM
wawazat??'s Avatar
wawazat?? wawazat?? is offline
Yeah, I'm still around
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Beverly Hills, MI
Posts: 3,770
Give it a good run before the test too Gary. Getting cars up to full operating temperature ensures that the cat is fully lit and functional.

Todd
__________________
Down to none
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-07-2004, 02:53 PM
MoreIBNR MoreIBNR is offline
Original Owner 1992-2008
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 367
Send a message via AIM to MoreIBNR
Thanks. I did run the car about 6 or 7 miles at up to 60 MPH before having it tested. Engine was at operating temperature. I don't think it was cold cats that caused it as my gas mileage has dropped a good bit in the last several thousand miles.

Quote:
Originally posted by wawazat??
Give it a good run before the test too Gary. Getting cars up to full operating temperature ensures that the cat is fully lit and functional.

Todd
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-07-2004, 03:56 PM
sperry's Avatar
sperry sperry is offline
$1 is just $1, but $2 = nachos
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 358
You know... my mileage has been pretty sketchy. My car's new to me, but the previous owner probably put all 190k miles on the original sensors... perhaps it's time to replace those little buggers!

There are 2 sensors total in the exhaust, right, one off each header?
__________________
3 turbos, 28 cylinders, 96 valves, 18 cams, 1400hp/1600ftlbs: '09 Outback XT / '06 Outback Sedan / '02 WRX / '94 SVX / '01 F-250 SuperDuty
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-07-2004, 04:38 PM
gsodonis's Avatar
gsodonis gsodonis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 614
OBDI's have two O2 sensors

The 92 - 95 OBDI SVX'i have only two O2 sensors, one on each exhaust pipe just past each header collector, just before the pre-cats.
The 96 - 97 OBDII SVX'i have a third sensor atop the main cat.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-07-2004, 04:43 PM
sperry's Avatar
sperry sperry is offline
$1 is just $1, but $2 = nachos
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 358
Re: OBDI's have two O2 sensors

Quote:
Originally posted by gsodonis
The 92 - 95 OBDI SVX'i have only two O2 sensors, one on each exhaust pipe just past each header collector, just before the pre-cats.
The 96 - 97 OBDII SVX'i have a third sensor atop the main cat.
Ah yes... OBD-II means the ECU has to be able to monitor catalytic efficiency... but I've got a '94 so just the 2 pre-cat for me!

I just ordered up a pair from www.oxygensensors.com... free shipping, no tax, and since I'm just a state over from CA, I'll probably have them Thursday... in time to help the fuel mileage situation before I have to drive to L.A. for the JGTC race.
__________________
3 turbos, 28 cylinders, 96 valves, 18 cams, 1400hp/1600ftlbs: '09 Outback XT / '06 Outback Sedan / '02 WRX / '94 SVX / '01 F-250 SuperDuty
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-07-2004, 09:08 PM
Ron Mummert Ron Mummert is offline
Invisible avatar
Alcyone Gold Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Shawsville, VA (Formally Ellicott City, MD)
Posts: 3,797
Send a message via AIM to Ron Mummert Send a message via Yahoo to Ron Mummert
Smile

For what it's worth, Gary, I recently posted my emission test ordeal with my other SVX, the Nissan 240S*X on another thread.
Shortened version - I failed 4 times, gradually replacing all the usual suspects a piece at a time (O2 sensor included). The final solution was a new CAT. Viola!! Car breathes cleaner than Ralph Nader's gas mask. Good luck.

Ron.
__________________
Good s**t happened. 69 was worth the wait.

'92 stock semi-pristine ebony - 160K
'96 Grand Caravan - 240K
'01 Miata SE - 79K
'07 Chrysler Pacifica - 60k - future money pit.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-07-2004, 09:30 PM
MoreIBNR MoreIBNR is offline
Original Owner 1992-2008
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 367
Send a message via AIM to MoreIBNR
Sorry to hear about all that you had to replace - must have cost a small fortune. I sure hope I don't have to replace more than the O2s and the speed sensor #2. My wife is already questioning whether it is worth it.

Quote:
Originally posted by Ron Mummert
For what it's worth, Gary, I recently posted my emission test ordeal with my other SVX, the Nissan 240S*X on another thread.
Shortened version - I failed 4 times, gradually replacing all the usual suspects a piece at a time (O2 sensor included). The final solution was a new CAT. Viola!! Car breathes cleaner than Ralph Nader's gas mask. Good luck.

Ron.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-07-2004, 10:19 PM
Ron Mummert Ron Mummert is offline
Invisible avatar
Alcyone Gold Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Shawsville, VA (Formally Ellicott City, MD)
Posts: 3,797
Send a message via AIM to Ron Mummert Send a message via Yahoo to Ron Mummert
Wink

[QUOTE]Originally posted by MoreIBNR
[B]Sorry to hear about all that you had to replace - must have cost a small fortune. I sure hope I don't have to replace more than the O2s and the speed sensor #2. My wife is already questioning whether it is worth it.


1. A wife can be replaced.
2. No - I didn't spend all that much, up until the CAT which was about $240.00 installed.

Does Joisey have a limit on what you gotta' spend to cure your ills? Merryland lets you off the hook for a two year pardon if you spend at least $450.00, which I did. So I could have failed for the fifth time & still be allowed to spew forth fumes in the interim.

Ron ( Thanks for the three CATS, Subaru!).
__________________
Good s**t happened. 69 was worth the wait.

'92 stock semi-pristine ebony - 160K
'96 Grand Caravan - 240K
'01 Miata SE - 79K
'07 Chrysler Pacifica - 60k - future money pit.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-09-2004, 03:57 PM
sperry's Avatar
sperry sperry is offline
$1 is just $1, but $2 = nachos
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 358
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ron Mummert
[B]
Quote:
Originally posted by MoreIBNR
Sorry to hear about all that you had to replace - must have cost a small fortune. I sure hope I don't have to replace more than the O2s and the speed sensor #2. My wife is already questioning whether it is worth it.


1. A wife can be replaced.
2. No - I didn't spend all that much, up until the CAT which was about $240.00 installed.

Does Joisey have a limit on what you gotta' spend to cure your ills? Merryland lets you off the hook for a two year pardon if you spend at least $450.00, which I did. So I could have failed for the fifth time & still be allowed to spew forth fumes in the interim.

Ron ( Thanks for the three CATS, Subaru!).
It's been my experience that due to CA emmissions rules, Subaru has to over-do it when it comes to cats. My WRX came with one in the up-pipe, one in the down-pipe and one in the mid-pipe.

I've now got only a single hi-flow cat in the mid-pipe, and even at the high altitude (makes the car run rich) I still pass smog w/ flying colors. 'Course they only do a simple plug-n-play OBD-II test here.

I'll bet two new hi-flow cats before the Y-junction in the SVX's exhaust will work better than the 3 old ones by a lot, and free up a little power. At least that's what I'm planning for my SVX... in addition to a true 1.25" dual exhaust and twin mufflers.
__________________
3 turbos, 28 cylinders, 96 valves, 18 cams, 1400hp/1600ftlbs: '09 Outback XT / '06 Outback Sedan / '02 WRX / '94 SVX / '01 F-250 SuperDuty
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122