The Subaru SVX World Network   SVX Network Forums
Live Chat!
SVX or Subaru Links
Old Lockers
Photo Post
How-To Documents
Message Archive
SVX Shop Search
IRC users:

Go Back   The Subaru SVX World Network > SVX Main Forums > Not Exactly SVX
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2005, 07:24 AM
dcarrb dcarrb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: none
Posts: 3,430
Subaru and GM part company

Enter Toyota

This is probably a very good move for Subaru.

dcb
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2005, 09:02 AM
Landshark's Avatar
Landshark Landshark is offline
Hater
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Burgh
Posts: 10,807
IBShadowsaysSubarumadeworstdecisionevAr
__________________
Alan

1987 928 S4 (Black) SOLD!
1997 SVX LSi (Ebony) SOLD!
2005 Legacy GT (Silver) [Cobb Stg 2+] SOLD!
1987 928 S4 (Black) SOLD!
2005 Forester XT Premium (Crystal Gray Metallic) SOLD!
2008 Lancer Evolution X MR (Apex Silver) [Cobb Stg 1+]
2015 Outlander Sport 2.4GT AWD (Mercury Gray)
2013 G37xS (Obsidian Black)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2005, 09:05 AM
dcarrb dcarrb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: none
Posts: 3,430
I read an editorial awhile back speculating that Toyota should buy GM.

dcb
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2005, 10:21 AM
Chiketkd's Avatar
Chiketkd Chiketkd is offline
Row faster...I hear banjos!!!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 10,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landshark
IBShadowsaysSubarumadeworstdecisionevAr
+12345

-Chike
__________________
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." - Plato

2013 Cosmic Blue 5spd Evo X GSR
2006 Galaxy Gray 6MT RX-8 (sold)
2006 Steel Gray WRX TR (sold)
1996 Brilliant Red SVX L (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2005, 10:32 AM
svxsubaru1's Avatar
svxsubaru1 svxsubaru1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 1,020
Well i guess no more cheap 92xs (imprezas) with he GM employe discount.
__________________
92 Honda CBR 600
95 Miata
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-05-2005, 08:20 PM
Shadow248 Shadow248 is offline
Rep from the outside world
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 1,209
Send a message via AIM to Shadow248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landshark
IBShadowsaysSubarumadeworstdecisionevAr
Actually, GM made a good decision. It's a waste of time for GM to mess with Subaru. Couldn't hurt Subaru though. If anything, you guys should be worried about your beloved cars losing anything resembling excitement. Look at what Toyota currently offers. You want a Subaru line like that? I wouldn't.

Good luck to ya.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcarrb
I read an editorial awhile back speculating that Toyota should buy GM.
Why would Toyota want all that debt? I've heard so many people saying how Toyota could buy GM...etc. Why would they? They'd gain nothing but a huge burden. Instead, Toyota has elected to help GM buy actually RAISING prices in their US lineup. I used to think that Toyota was out to get GM, but I am now questioning the presumption that Toyota wants to be on top. I'm starting to believe that they really don't care. They did nothing to counter GM's employee pricing (which increased their market share singlehandedly by almost 10%), and have made several moves that actually help GM in the long run. So i dunno. Maybe they're just crazy.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-05-2005, 10:00 PM
Mr. Pockets's Avatar
Mr. Pockets Mr. Pockets is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 6,916
Send a message via ICQ to Mr. Pockets
Registered SVX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow248
Instead, Toyota has elected to help GM buy actually RAISING prices in their US lineup. I used to think that Toyota was out to get GM, but I am now questioning the presumption that Toyota wants to be on top. I'm starting to believe that they really don't care. They did nothing to counter GM's employee pricing (which increased their market share singlehandedly by almost 10%), and have made several moves that actually help GM in the long run. So i dunno. Maybe they're just crazy.
Please provide a link showing an announcement from Toyota that they're raising prices to help GM. The last I heard, Toyota denied they were going to do this.

Toyota are concerned about the Big Three. They're worried that one of them failing would cause patriotic backlash against them.

As for Toyota not countering GM's employee pricing, I don't think that was restraint on their part. I think it shows how comfortable of a position they're in.
__________________


2005 RX-8 Grand Touring
2005 Outback
2002 Mercedes-Benz E320 wagon

END OF LINE

Last edited by Mr. Pockets; 10-05-2005 at 10:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-06-2005, 04:35 PM
Royal Tiger's Avatar
Royal Tiger Royal Tiger is offline
Certified Porschephile
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 2,452
Does this mean there will not be a new Corolla Rally car anytime soon in WRC? And can we get the Toyota F1 car painted with a blue rear wing just for us?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-06-2005, 09:15 PM
Shadow248 Shadow248 is offline
Rep from the outside world
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 1,209
Send a message via AIM to Shadow248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Pockets
Please provide a link showing an announcement from Toyota that they're raising prices to help GM. The last I heard, Toyota denied they were going to do this.
You could say the motivation is open to interpretation. Toyota will not say that they did it to "save GM" (and that's the wrong way to put it even if it IS the truth), but look at Toyota's current position, portfolio and future plans. You will see how much they have to gain by keeping GM around. It does make sense.

That being said, I won't argue that there is undeniable evidence that they decided to raise prices to help GM, only that they did decide to raise prices.

http://www.freep.com/money/autonews/...e_20050730.htm

http://money.cnn.com/2005/07/26/Autos/toyota_prices/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Pockets
As for Toyota not countering GM's employee pricing, I don't think that was restraint on their part. I think it shows how comfortable of a position they're in.
This could have been their position going into the "price wars", however, on the tail end, I guarantee you Hiroshi Okuda is kicking himself. GM gained almost 5% in market share thanks to their aggressive pricing. The company's stock has stabilized and their aggressive fixed-cost cutting measures will only further the improvement of GM's situation. Seeing as prices of most of GM's lineup will not be returning to their previous levels, Toyota's ever-slowing march on GM may finally come to a halt.

http://www.thecarconnection.com/Auto...175.A8785.html
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-07-2005, 06:01 AM
benebob's Avatar
benebob benebob is offline
Have a poncho I can borrow?
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 6,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow248
GM gained almost 5% in market share thanks to their aggressive pricing. The company's stock has stabilized and their aggressive fixed-cost cutting measures will only further the improvement of GM's situation. Seeing as prices of most of GM's lineup will not be returning to their previous levels, Toyota's ever-slowing march on GM may finally come to a halt.
Yeah a gain, they will pay for during the next 2 years. How many people are gonna buy a GM that isn't offered at a discount? Everyone will wait for the price to come down in their head (even though they are now priced a little more in line with other manufactures). 20 years of rebates will do that to ya. It will REALLY hurt them for the next couple of years but it is something that should've been done well 19.5 years ago. Toyota's march won't end until GM can get a clue on designing an engine that doesn't sound like 2 pushrods eating themselves.
__________________
British vehicles are my last ditch attempt to keep the nasty Italian thoughts in my mind at bay. So far its working.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-10-2005, 01:04 PM
Noir's Avatar
Noir Noir is offline
Ever Vigilant He Never Sleeps.
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mullet Country
Posts: 5,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow248
You could say the motivation is open to interpretation. Toyota will not say that they did it to "save GM" (and that's the wrong way to put it even if it IS the truth), but look at Toyota's current position, portfolio and future plans. You will see how much they have to gain by keeping GM around. It does make sense.

That being said, I won't argue that there is undeniable evidence that they decided to raise prices to help GM, only that they did decide to raise prices.

http://www.freep.com/money/autonews/...e_20050730.htm

This could have been their position going into the "price wars", however, on the tail end, I guarantee you Hiroshi Okuda is kicking himself. GM gained almost 5% in market share thanks to their aggressive pricing. The company's stock has stabilized and their aggressive fixed-cost cutting measures will only further the improvement of GM's situation. Seeing as prices of most of GM's lineup will not be returning to their previous levels, Toyota's ever-slowing march on GM may finally come to a halt.

http://www.thecarconnection.com/Auto...175.A8785.html
You know, I'm not too bright...but I don't see how Hiroshi Okuda is kicking himself. Looks like over 60% of their sales increase came from loyal GM fanboi's like yourself. That leaves 30 something percent left of their increase to turning over Toyota loyalists.

I could be wrong, but a friend of mine who's a manager at Enterprise Car Rental told me that they were purchasing more GM vehicles over Toyota...maybe because of price increase? If that's the case for these fleet vehicle purchases, then the margin is shrinking for winning over new customers from Toyota's irongrip in a whooping 2.1% increase.

It seems that not many Toyotas were traded in for new GM's though. Not significanly enough to mention. We won't know the results until the next postings to see if the increase hurt Toyota.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per your source:
"That Toyota is increasing prices by 1% or so is not unusual at all. It's what they've done every year," said Jesse Toprak, senior analyst at Edmunds.com, a consumer auto-data service in Santa Monica, Calif. "That they are doing this while most competitors are cutting prices is unique."

Toyota, which increased U.S. sales 11% in this year's first half, is raising prices 1.2% on average. GM's first-half sales rose 2.1% because of a 47% surge in June, when it began offering employee discounts to all buyers. Ford Motor Co. and DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group followed that offer this month, while Asian makers such as Toyota haven't matched it.

From your boys at JD Power and Associates:
The Power Information Network trade data shows that in both May and June, more than 60 percent of the vehicles traded in on GM purchases have been GM vehicles. There has also been a mild increase in the number of Ford vehicles being traded in for new GM models.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last edited by Noir; 10-10-2005 at 01:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122