'92 vs. '97

[Knightwulf]

Collected info so far:

How the '97's differ from the '92's:

215/55/16 tires
OBDII
Manual seat belts
Position of the shifter "lock out" button moved
Split rear seats
Transmission upgrades that allowed for better flow and therefore, less prone to overheating.
Speed limiter locked at 145 MPH
Diagnostic connection to the right of the steering wheel, instead of a coin holder.
Wood dash changed color slightly


Alright.. I've done my searches and just can't find this info. Any 'official' review states, "There were few changes between the model years..." I'm looking for something more specific.

I would've sworn I saw it somewhere, but it may've just been my mind lumping all the stuff I saw together...

All that I can find on specifics are colours, the front grill and a reference to no automatic belts.

I thought I saw some mention of later model SVXii having moonroofs as opposed to sunroofs (glass rather than a solid panel), but I'm not sure. I believe there was also mention of the '95's - '97's having a stronger tranny and maybe some other minor mechanical changes that make them considerably more reliable than their older bretheren? Additionally, were the '97's still using Freon in the A/C units?

Anyone have a full list of the differences between the 92's & '97's (assume LS-L vs. LSi)?

[Budfreak]

92 wins it.

I don't remember the 97's numbers(high 15's, low 16's), but the 92 did 15.2 in the 1/4.

+ The 92's have no speed limiter.

[Phast SVX]

Originally Posted by Knightwulf

Alright.. I've done my searches and just can't find this info. Any 'offical' review states, "There were few changes between the model years..." I'm looking for something more specific.

I would've sworn I saw it somewhere, but it may've just been my mind lumping all the stuff I saw together...

All that I can find on specifics are colours, the front grill and a reference to no automatic belts.

I thought I saw some mention of later model SVXii having moonroofs as opposed to sunroofs (glass rather than a solid panel), but I'm not sure. I believe there was also mention of the '95's - '97's having a stronger tranny and maybe some other minor mechanical changes that make them considerably more reliable than their older bretheren?

Anyone have a full list of the differences between the 92's & '97's (assume LS-L vs. LSi)?

Hey Wulf, longtime no hear

The 97's(as well as 96s) are OBDII, meaning they have updated emmissions as per law.
The seat belts went manual in 94 and up models, as well as the shifter "lock out" button moving its position. thats what i could come up with.
phil

[Budfreak]

Sorry, I was lost in a daze of percocets

[TomsSVX]

all 94.5+ models that were not L models also got split rear seats.

Transmission upgrades simlpy allowed for better flow and therefore less prone to overheating.

Speed limiters are not a big deal as no one really needs to do more than 145mph anyway Not to say some of us haven't

Oh and the 98+ models also had a 6mt model. I have one of the 4 made

Tom

[sharky512345]

the 93 ish + have the lock button in the center console.
the 96/97s have diagnostic connection to the right of the steering wheel instead of a coin holder.
92-96 has 225/50/16 stock tire size. '97s have 215/55/16 (pretty sure about this size, not positive).

[sharky512345]

oh and the wood dash changed color slightly in or around 94 i believe.

[Trevor]

Originally Posted by sharky512345

the 93 ish + have the lock button in the center console.
the 96/97s have diagnostic connection to the right of the steering wheel instead of a coin holder.
92-96 has 225/50/16 stock tire size. '97s have 215/55/16 (pretty sure about this size, not positive).

This is very interesting.

A couple of months ago I had to fit new tyres and fitted 205/60 -16 Michelin Energy MXV8. I did not fit these without due consideration. These tyres are of a touring variety, rather than performance tyres and there was a saving in outlay as a further advantage. They do have an adequate speed rating.

A car to me has always been a source of enjoyment, only in respect handling and satisfaction once in the driving seat, all other factors being a secondary comprise. What many would consider a downgrade, has in effect been somewhat of a transformation.

As hoped for, the smaller section on the same rim width, has resulted in much more responsive handling, due to the straighter side walls. Any supposed reduction in adhesion I can handle from the driving seat and have fun doing so, but such has not been the case.

It is very interesting that it would appear, due to experience, the later models followed the same course.

[svxstarship]

just for the record, top speed for my 92, 143mph, my 96, 143 mph. Canadian model.

[Earthworm]

Originally Posted by Trevor

fitted 205/60 -16

That will be the size of my next set of winter tires.

[Knightwulf]

Thanks a bunch for the info so far, folks.

Can anyone confirm or deny the moonroofs?
...and anyone know about the A/C coolant?

[TomsSVX]

moonroof were never a factory option in the states. For that matter anywhere as far as I know. Some people have adapted them.

The freon changed all post 92 models from R12(liquid Gold nowadays) to R134A that you can find at any auto parts store

Tom

[Knightwulf]

Originally Posted by TomsSVX

moonroof were never a factory option in the states. For that matter anywhere as far as I know. Some people have adapted them.

The freon changed all post 92 models from R12(liquid Gold nowadays) to R134A that you can find at any auto parts store

Tom

Phenomenal, thanks! The A/C went out on my '92, and in WI it's illegal to convert/have converted your A/C system to R134A.

Just wondering what I have to look forward to on Friday when I take delivery of my '97...

[TomsSVX]

why is it illegal?? Shops can safely vaccum out any remaining R12 so it doesn't pollute

Tom

[Phast SVX]

sweet! we should have another meet up next time i make it back to madison. Goodluck
phil