The Subaru SVX World Network   SVX Network Forums
Live Chat!
SVX or Subaru Links
Old Lockers
Photo Post
How-To Documents
Message Archive
SVX Shop Search
IRC users:

Go Back   The Subaru SVX World Network > SVX Main Forums > General SVX Babble
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Wheel Weights: outside rim vs taped inside
I have weights on the outside rim 8 32.00%
I have the weights taped inside the rim 13 52.00%
I don't fall under either of those two choices! 4 16.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 11-11-2003, 09:38 AM
Shadowyng's Avatar
Shadowyng Shadowyng is offline
Directionally Challenged
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 169
Send a message via AIM to Shadowyng
I have the taped weights on for a year and at 120 they do a godd job of sticking to where they were put....and I can't imagine the amount of heat you are worried about won't leave your tires in a puddle before the adhesive gets loose.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-11-2003, 10:14 AM
mohrds's Avatar
mohrds mohrds is offline
Fight Eminent Domain Abuse!
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 3,175
Send a message via AIM to mohrds Send a message via Yahoo to mohrds
I always get inside, glue on weights. They hold up perfectly through bumps, winter, summer, rain, snow, sleet, hail, etc.

I know this may start a flame war, but as for the amount of weights, a better quality tire (More $$$) will be better balanced and require less weight than a lower quality tire.

If you ever get a chance, have your empty rims spin balanced. I bet they will be close to perfect. When I had mine repaired/refinished they balanced the empty rims for me just to see how they were.

Doug
__________________
1992 LS Touring (6/91) - Currently undergoing a five speed swap
Black over Claret with spoiler; 235,000 miles; Mods: 2002 Legacy 5 speed, ACT Pressure Plate, Excedy Clutch, Short Throw Shifter, Aussie Powerchip
1992 LS Touring (6/91)
Black over Claret with 2.5" setback spoiler; 202,000 miles; Mods: B&M Cooler
1994 LSi (4/93)
Bordeaux Pearl; 198,000 miles; Mods: Weight reduction.

1969 Mustang GT Convertible
1970 Mustang Convertible
2000 Ford Excursion
Sola lingua bona est lingua mortua.

My Locker
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-12-2003, 12:59 AM
svxjoe's Avatar
svxjoe svxjoe is offline
Only SVX @ UCF (Cool!)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 258
Send a message via AIM to svxjoe
Tack-wieghts are tacky!

Tape-weights should lie flat and hardly be seen. These look much better, and can be placed anywhere on the inside of the rim(Near face of rim or back of rim).

Tape weights are more reliable when it comes to staying on. Tack-weights are subject to anything the outside of the wheel may encounter... potholes, curbs, etc.

The Adhesive for tape-weights is pretty damn strong. I know because the shop that rotated and rebalanced my tires (I have them remove all weights and start fresh) they left the adhevsive backing strip from the back of the weights on my rim. They had to remove the old tape-weights using a chizzle of somesort and were to lazy to clean up the sticky strip left.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-12-2003, 09:21 AM
mohrds's Avatar
mohrds mohrds is offline
Fight Eminent Domain Abuse!
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 3,175
Send a message via AIM to mohrds Send a message via Yahoo to mohrds
Quote:
Originally posted by svxjoe
Tack-weights are tacky!

Tape-weights should lie flat and hardly be seen. These look much better, and can be placed anywhere on the inside of the rim(Near face of rim or back of rim).

Just for clarification, Tack-weights are the kind that you hammer onto the lip and tape weights are the glue on kind that I was talking about, right?

I just want to make sure there aren't other types of weights I'm unfamiliar with.

Doug
__________________
1992 LS Touring (6/91) - Currently undergoing a five speed swap
Black over Claret with spoiler; 235,000 miles; Mods: 2002 Legacy 5 speed, ACT Pressure Plate, Excedy Clutch, Short Throw Shifter, Aussie Powerchip
1992 LS Touring (6/91)
Black over Claret with 2.5" setback spoiler; 202,000 miles; Mods: B&M Cooler
1994 LSi (4/93)
Bordeaux Pearl; 198,000 miles; Mods: Weight reduction.

1969 Mustang GT Convertible
1970 Mustang Convertible
2000 Ford Excursion
Sola lingua bona est lingua mortua.

My Locker
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-12-2003, 12:11 PM
subymtnguy's Avatar
subymtnguy subymtnguy is offline
"high" in Colorado
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Idaho Springs, Colorado
Posts: 317
weights and balance

When I bought my new Yoko's a few months back, I had then use adhesive weights on the inside for cosmetic reasons. They DON'T come off easily.

When I was a kid, I remember a "Hunter" spin balance where the wheels were spun on the car (very fast). There was a round piece with weights in the center, that clamped on the outside of the wheel. The operator would lean his forearm on the fender, and slide the weights with his other hand.

You could see and feel any out of balance. As the weights were adjusted (on the ouside clamp thing), you could see and feel any vibration magically dissappear to nothing.

It seemed to me that this was the best way to balance, as it would balance the wheel on the axel, and would compensate for weak suspension parts etc. This thing was GREAT!

Does anyone remember this "Hunter" balance?? ...Or am I just showing my age again....
__________________
Tom
92 Liquid Silver LSL
85 BRAT GL
81 280ZX
91 Legacy wagon
86 Pontiac Parisenne (55k)
86 Kawasaki ZG 1000 Concours
81 KZ 1000 LTD (shaft)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122