The Subaru SVX World Network   SVX Network Forums
Live Chat!
SVX or Subaru Links
Old Lockers
Photo Post
How-To Documents
Message Archive
SVX Shop Search
IRC users:

Go Back   The Subaru SVX World Network > SVX Main Forums > Technical Q & A

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-09-2006, 08:34 PM
cdigerlando cdigerlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Longwood, FL
Posts: 1,422
Volumetric Efficiency

I have been corresponding with Harvey regarding setting up a volumetric efficiency graph for tuning the SVX. After getting into this more, I am thinking that the volumetric efficiency calculated by Harvey might not be applicable for a turbo charged or supercharged application, since there are significant pressure drops and drops in efficiency in a FI engine than an NA engine. I think that the best way to calculate VE would be to tap into the MAF and log some real data to help narrow down these values. In fact I think that these values will certainly change even after an intercooler is added, and if any exhaust modifications are made. So this is something I would need to consider as the car modified even further.

Any thoughts on how to best log data from the MAF?

Thanks

Chuck D.
__________________
Chuck D.
1992 Subaru SVX LS-L - Heavily modded turbo
2002 Subaru Impreza WRX- Turboxs stg3 & Susp. Mods
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-09-2006, 09:15 PM
Trevor's Avatar
Trevor Trevor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 5,223
Registered SVX
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdigerlando
I have been corresponding with Harvey regarding setting up a volumetric efficiency graph for tuning the SVX. After getting into this more, I am thinking that the volumetric efficiency calculated by Harvey might not be applicable for a turbo charged or supercharged application, since there are significant pressure drops and drops in efficiency in a FI engine than an NA engine. I think that the best way to calculate VE would be to tap into the MAF and log some real data to help narrow down these values. In fact I think that these values will certainly change even after an intercooler is added, and if any exhaust modifications are made. So this is something I would need to consider as the car modified even further.

Any thoughts on how to best log data from the MAF?

Thanks

Chuck D.
I am rather in the dark here. Could you please detail as to how the VE was calculated by Harvey. There are many factors involved and each would require a finite value and the allocation of these values in accordance with the application i.e. forced induction and by what means, or normally aspirated.

The MAF will give you air flow values but exactly how do you wish to relate these to VE as such?
__________________
Trevor, New Zealand.

As a child, on cold mornings I gladly stood in cowpats to warm my bare feet, but I detest bull$hit!

Last edited by Trevor; 06-09-2006 at 09:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-09-2006, 09:31 PM
Phast SVX's Avatar
Phast SVX Phast SVX is offline
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOST
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,800
Send a message via AIM to Phast SVX
I dont see how calculating Volumetric efficency will benefit you in tuning. What you need to know is AFR and load values, and then use the knock sensor system that came with your car to adjust accordingly, chances are you will be running close to stock timing, so maybe michael will be able to help you out.
__________________
~Phil
Teal 1992 Subaru SVX Turbo - Sold in May 2011 to peace-frog.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-09-2006, 10:31 PM
Trevor's Avatar
Trevor Trevor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 5,223
Registered SVX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phast SVX
I dont see how calculating Volumetric efficency will benefit you in tuning. What you need to know is AFR and load values, and then use the knock sensor system that came with your car to adjust accordingly, chances are you will be running close to stock timing, so maybe michael will be able to help you out.
Exactly Phil,

I am trying to ascertain what BS has again been handed out here to a member, hence my reference to finite figures. VE can only be indicative as a ratio/percentage.

It is unlikely that the extent of hot air excreted, will ever come to light. The VE of the expediter is beyond question.

Cheers, Trevor.
__________________
Trevor, New Zealand.

As a child, on cold mornings I gladly stood in cowpats to warm my bare feet, but I detest bull$hit!

Last edited by Trevor; 06-09-2006 at 10:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-10-2006, 06:59 AM
-JJ-'s Avatar
-JJ- -JJ- is offline
Endangered Species
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 579
Send a message via MSN to -JJ-
The Question was:
What is the best way to log data from the MAF...??

Im interested to know aswell

Cheers,
Jake
__________________
1992 Pearl / Black SVX

removed intake silencer, k&N pannel filter, trans cooler, 94 JDM 4eat, Noltec front swaybar mounts, Motorsport D&S disks with EBC Greenstuff pads
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-10-2006, 08:58 AM
SVXRide's Avatar
SVXRide SVXRide is offline
Official AutoX Part Breaker
Subaru Gold Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Midlothian, VA 23112
Posts: 8,138
Registered SVX
The wide band that SVXFiles and Mychailo both have (okay, so I've still got Mychailo's ) both have datalogger features. If you go back and check some of Mychailo's posts, you'll see he was able to measure MAF voltage vs rpm. There really shouldn't be any reason why you can't tap into any of the lines coming out of the ECU (as long as their voltage levels are sufficient).
-Bill
__________________
Retired NASA Rocket Scientist

Most famous NASA "Child" - OSIRIS-REx delivered samples from asteroid BENNU to Earth in Sept. 2023

Center Network Member #989

'92 Fully caged, 5 speed, waiting for its fully built EG33
'92 "Test Mule", 4:44 Auto, JDM 4:44 Rear Diff with Mech LSD, Tuned headers, Full one-off suspension
'92(?) Laguna, 6 spd and other stuff (still at OT's place)
My Locker
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-10-2006, 09:41 AM
cdigerlando cdigerlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Longwood, FL
Posts: 1,422
V eff

Thanks for the replies. Exactly my thoughts. VE will be different for every kind of intake exhaust application. Probably best to use the MAF. I'll check what was done before.

The reason I need it is that electromotive uses volumetric efficiency as a tuning table. I did not think I would need it either, but now that I think of it, it makes sense. The electromotive software does not use an MAF, and calculates mass air flow rate by knowing the pressure, temperature, and rpm of the motor. In order to convert from rpm to mass air flow rate, volumetric efficiency will be an important part of the equation. Although the efficiency may be from the plenum where I take my air pressure reading to the cylinder instead of the entire motor.

Thanks for your input

Chuck D.
__________________
Chuck D.
1992 Subaru SVX LS-L - Heavily modded turbo
2002 Subaru Impreza WRX- Turboxs stg3 & Susp. Mods
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-10-2006, 09:53 AM
Phast SVX's Avatar
Phast SVX Phast SVX is offline
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOST
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,800
Send a message via AIM to Phast SVX
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdigerlando
Thanks for the replies. Exactly my thoughts. VE will be different for every kind of intake exhaust application. Probably best to use the MAF. I'll check what was done before.

The reason I need it is that electromotive uses volumetric efficiency as a tuning table. I did not think I would need it either, but now that I think of it, it makes sense. The electromotive software does not use an MAF, and calculates mass air flow rate by knowing the pressure, temperature, and rpm of the motor. In order to convert from rpm to mass air flow rate, volumetric efficiency will be an important part of the equation. Although the efficiency may be from the plenum where I take my air pressure reading to the cylinder instead of the entire motor.

Thanks for your input

Chuck D.
Then it utilizes a map sensor, which will calculate load, and let you to apply a set knock AFR for that load. IT does utilize speed density right?
phil
__________________
~Phil
Teal 1992 Subaru SVX Turbo - Sold in May 2011 to peace-frog.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-10-2006, 05:42 PM
oab_au oab_au is offline
Registered User
Subaru Gold Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Coffs Harb, Australia.
Posts: 5,032
Significant Technical Input Registered SVX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor
Exactly Phil,

I am trying to ascertain what BS has again been handed out here to a member, hence my reference to finite figures. VE can only be indicative as a ratio/percentage.

It is unlikely that the extent of hot air excreted, will ever come to light. The VE of the expediter is beyond question.

Cheers, Trevor.
What a waste of space.

Harvey.
__________________
One Arm Bloke.
Tell it like it is!

95 Lsi. Bordeaux Pearl, Aust. RHD.149,000Kls Subaru BBS wheels.
97 Liberty GX Auto sedan. 320,000Kls.
04 Liberty 30R Auto Premium. 92.000kls.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-10-2006, 07:23 PM
oab_au oab_au is offline
Registered User
Subaru Gold Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Coffs Harb, Australia.
Posts: 5,032
Significant Technical Input Registered SVX
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdigerlando
Thanks for the replies. Exactly my thoughts. VE will be different for every kind of intake exhaust application. Probably best to use the MAF. I'll check what was done before.

The reason I need it is that electromotive uses volumetric efficiency as a tuning table. I did not think I would need it either, but now that I think of it, it makes sense. The electromotive software does not use an MAF, and calculates mass air flow rate by knowing the pressure, temperature, and rpm of the motor. In order to convert from rpm to mass air flow rate, volumetric efficiency will be an important part of the equation. Although the efficiency may be from the plenum where I take my air pressure reading to the cylinder instead of the entire motor.

Thanks for your input

Chuck D.
Chuck if they only enter the VE to 150%, then I would think that they only want the engines VE characteristics, to tailor the maps to the way the engine breathes through the rev range. without the added boost included. Any boost that you add, will just be automatically included in the map set up.

So the figures that I gave you would be the engines characteristic VE curve.

Harvey.
__________________
One Arm Bloke.
Tell it like it is!

95 Lsi. Bordeaux Pearl, Aust. RHD.149,000Kls Subaru BBS wheels.
97 Liberty GX Auto sedan. 320,000Kls.
04 Liberty 30R Auto Premium. 92.000kls.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-10-2006, 07:23 PM
Trevor's Avatar
Trevor Trevor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 5,223
Registered SVX
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by oab_au
What a waste of space.

Harvey.
Not so Harvey. It has now been ascertained that VE as a finite measurement, which is not a feasible expression was suggested only as method of describing an unknown factor in the absence of a MAF signal. Thus the original dilemma caused as a result of you suggesting VE in finite terms, has been put to rest.

Quote:- "I am thinking that the volumetric efficiency calculated by Harvey might not be applicable for a turbo charged or supercharged application,"

As I said --- It is unlikely that the extent of hot air excreted, will ever come to light. The VE of the expediter is beyond question.

Trevor.
__________________
Trevor, New Zealand.

As a child, on cold mornings I gladly stood in cowpats to warm my bare feet, but I detest bull$hit!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-10-2006, 08:39 PM
Trevor's Avatar
Trevor Trevor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 5,223
Registered SVX
Quote:
Originally Posted by -JJ-
The Question was:
What is the best way to log data from the MAF...??

Im interested to know aswell

Cheers,
Jake
The ECU obtains a signal from the MAF on the basis of current flowing in the signal line, rather than voltage, which varies as compensating factors adjust and runs 12-14 volts above ground. The current is directly proportional to the mass of air flowing.

Therefore if you were to insert an ammeter in the signal line you should be able to secure a useful proportional measurement, which you could plot. I would guess that only milli amps will be involved. The resistance of a moving coil, or digital instrument, should not effect the signal and in fact will be compensated for.
__________________
Trevor, New Zealand.

As a child, on cold mornings I gladly stood in cowpats to warm my bare feet, but I detest bull$hit!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-10-2006, 09:34 PM
cdigerlando cdigerlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Longwood, FL
Posts: 1,422
Gonna give it a try.

I might give that ammeter a try. First I may do some trial and error stuff as Phast suggests. I've got a wideband, EGT, and knock sensor, so I should be able to hone in on the correct fuel to add. I'm also looking at LANs timing numbers for his stage III supercharged engine (a little tuned down), and his high boost AFRs.

Again thanks to everyone for your help. I appreciate all the help I can get.
__________________
Chuck D.
1992 Subaru SVX LS-L - Heavily modded turbo
2002 Subaru Impreza WRX- Turboxs stg3 & Susp. Mods
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-10-2006, 10:35 PM
Trevor's Avatar
Trevor Trevor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 5,223
Registered SVX
Greetings Chuck,

I was not able to give you the required info on the MAF by PM as your mail box is full. Please do not delete any VE figures you have on file.

Cheers, Trevor.
__________________
Trevor, New Zealand.

As a child, on cold mornings I gladly stood in cowpats to warm my bare feet, but I detest bull$hit!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-11-2006, 07:37 AM
cdigerlando cdigerlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Longwood, FL
Posts: 1,422
My Box

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor
Greetings Chuck,

I was not able to give you the required info on the MAF by PM as your mail box is full. Please do not delete any VE figures you have on file.

Cheers, Trevor.

Sorry about that. I went a cleaned up my box. Thanks.
__________________
Chuck D.
1992 Subaru SVX LS-L - Heavily modded turbo
2002 Subaru Impreza WRX- Turboxs stg3 & Susp. Mods
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122