Just for Electrophyllis......

Landshark · #1 10-19-2006, 09:49 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJmbomyq0fc

Budfreak · #2 10-19-2006, 09:52 PM

Duck and cover, Here it comes!

Landshark · #3 10-19-2006, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Budfreak

Duck and cover, Here it comes!

Budfreak · #4 10-19-2006, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Landshark

lhopp77 · #5 10-20-2006, 07:37 AM

Lee

RSVX · #6 10-20-2006, 07:45 AM

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

And the DOW broke 12,000 today...

Landshark · #7 10-21-2006, 09:05 AM

where's Electrophallis?

he must be preparing the "Mother-Of-All-Cut-N-Pastes"!!!!!!!!!

Electrophil · #8 10-21-2006, 02:58 PM

Now why in the world would that video upset me?

The republicans are no doubt going to lose the house over their total incompetence, the senate is only a toss up because there aren't enough seats up for grabs. The presidency is a bygone conclusion if we run a turtle in 2008.

Congratulations on finally climbing above the dow average set in the Clinton era after only 6 years. It stayed so steady during the Clinton years, I can understand how the slight increase amazes you after only 6 years.

Congratulations for only having 1 outrageously major attack on U.S. soil so far.

Iraq has been a stunning success. It's really been a wonderful week.

The decrease in gas prices from triple prices to only double prices of what it was in 2000 is amazing. kudos!!

Unemployment rates are only slightly above the Clinton era. Good job!!

Inflation rates are much higher than under Clinton, but could be worse!!

Interest rates are much higher than under Clinton, but still.... could be worse.

Your successes in Iran and North Korea are above reproach. You have helped them like no other U.S. party could dream of achieving.

Overall though..... the U.S. population has still decided to fire you. So go ahead, pack your bags and get the shuck out. Please take that windbag O'Really!! with you.

Sorry. But nice video.

Electrophil · #9 10-21-2006, 03:03 PM

By the way, there is a large conservative group running around in YouTube flagging all democratic biased videos as inappropriate.

Will you Rebuticants please quit acting like children? Or at least stop sleeping with them.

lhopp77 · #10 10-25-2006, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Electrophil

Will you Rebuticants please quit acting like children? Or at least stop sleeping with them.

Seems to me it was Stubbs the DEMOCRAT that slept with one---the republican just sent inappropriate emails (read---NOT SEXUAL) to a young one (16 year old) and homosexual advances to a 19 year old by text message.

Keep it straight. No pun intended.

Lee

Electrophil · #11 10-25-2006, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lhopp77

Seems to me it was Stubbs the DEMOCRAT that slept with one---the republican just sent inappropriate emails (read---NOT SEXUAL) to a young one (16 year old) and homosexual advances to a 19 year old by text message.

Keep it straight. No pun intended.

Lee

I'm a little more concerned with dishonesty, and total lack of integrity myself. Being a pervert doesn't necessarily destroy a country. The republicans are on their way to doing just that.

But not for much longer.

lhopp77 · #12 10-26-2006, 08:03 AM

Just Released - Agenda for the Democratic National Convention for 2008:

7:00 P.M. Opening flag burning.
7:15 P.M. Pledge of allegiance to U.N. and opening song by the Dixie Chicks
7:30 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
7:30 till 8:00 P.M. Nonreligious prayer and worship. Jessie Jackson and Al
Sharpton.
8:00 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
8:05 P.M. Ceremonial tree hugging and Cat show
8:15- 8:30 P.M. Gay Wedding - Barney Frank, presiding.
8:30 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
8:35 P.M. Free Saddam Rally. Cindy Sheehan &Susan Sarandon.
9:00 P.M. Keynote speech. The proper etiquette for surrender - French
President Jacques Chirac
9:15 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
9:20 P.M. Collection to benefit Osama Bin Laden kidney transplant fund.
9:30 P.M. Unveiling of plan to free freedom fighters from Guantanamo Bay -
Sean Penn.
9:40 P.M. Why I hate the Military - a short talk by William Jefferson
Clinton.
9:45 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
9:50 P.M. Dan Rather presented Truth in Broadcasting award by Michael
Moore.
9:55 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
10:00 P.M. How George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld brought down the World Trade
Center Towers - Howard Dean.
10:30 P.M. Nomination of Hillary Rodham Clinton by Mahmud Ahmadinejad.
11:00 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
11:05 P.M. Al Gore reinvents the Internet.
11:15 P.M. Our Troops are War Criminals - John Kerry.
11:30 P.M. Coronation Of Mrs. Rodham Clinton.
12:00 A.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
12:05 A.M. Bill asks Ted to drive Hillary home.

Lee

shotgunslade · #13 10-27-2006, 11:20 AM

I am impressed by the difference between Electrophil's post and Ihopp77's post. Electrophil's was about issues, which could be discussed and for which there might be some hope of reaching agreement or finding common ground, even if they were presented in a pretty aggressive way. Issues, furthermore, involve us all and are important to how we, as a country, proceed from here. Ihopp77's post was about character assassination, slander and personal attack. Nothing positive can come from this point of departure. This approach, of course, is typical from certain parties in this country. Rush Limbaugh about Michael J. Fox. the anti-Ford campaign ads in Virginia. Paul Pallen's "macaca." Anything Ann Coulter says. Those who subscribe to this way of thought, to this means of discourse, have absolutely no business being involved in the affairs of this country because they are intent on division, not unification, they are intent upon vilification, not upon reaching understanding. They don't seem to care if the country falls apart as long as they can make their points against those they don't like. I have a very low opinion of George Bush's character and intellect, but that opinion is irrelevant in any discussion of policies and the way forward for this country. The proof as they say, is in the performance. The debate should be concerning the results of the current leadership, not whether or not W is an idiot, a slacker, a hypocrite, etc. To engage in the latter reduces me to the level of those who pursue that line of discourse. I'm much better than that. So is Electrophil.

Electrophil · #14 10-27-2006, 11:41 AM

Wow...I'm kinda speechless..

Thank you!

Landshark · #15 10-27-2006, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shotgunslade

I am impressed by the difference between Electrophil's post and Ihopp77's post. Electrophil's was about issues, which could be discussed and for which there might be some hope of reaching agreement or finding common ground, even if they were presented in a pretty aggressive way. Issues, furthermore, involve us all and are important to how we, as a country, proceed from here. Ihopp77's post was about character assassination, slander and personal attack. Nothing positive can come from this point of departure. This approach, of course, is typical from certain parties in this country. Rush Limbaugh about Michael J. Fox. the anti-Ford campaign ads in Virginia. Paul Pallen's "macaca." Anything Ann Coulter says. Those who subscribe to this way of thought, to this means of discourse, have absolutely no business being involved in the affairs of this country because they are intent on division, not unification, they are intent upon vilification, not upon reaching understanding. They don't seem to care if the country falls apart as long as they can make their points against those they don't like. I have a very low opinion of George Bush's character and intellect, but that opinion is irrelevant in any discussion of policies and the way forward for this country. The proof as they say, is in the performance. The debate should be concerning the results of the current leadership, not whether or not W is an idiot, a slacker, a hypocrite, etc. To engage in the latter reduces me to the level of those who pursue that line of discourse. I'm much better than that. So is Electrophil.

i am impressed with your reading comprehension, and slant. looks to me like Electrohil busted out the "Republicans sleeping with children" stereotype in his 2nd post in this thread.

i would vote for whoever i thought would do the best job - i'm not blindly Republican. i just haven't seen a Democrat yet with any ideas or plans - all they do is criticize Bush. Kerry always said he had all kinds of plans, but he never said what they were. its like they are so angry that Bush won the last election that all their energy is focused toward bad-mouthing him. period. and this "apologize to the world", "our country is horrible", blah blah blah crap from the liberals makes me sick to my stomach. this politically correct pussification of America needs to end.