The Subaru SVX World Network   SVX Network Forums
Live Chat!
SVX or Subaru Links
Old Lockers
Photo Post
How-To Documents
Message Archive
SVX Shop Search
IRC users:

Go Back   The Subaru SVX World Network > SVX Main Forums > Technical Q & A

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-20-2004, 10:29 PM
deruvian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question 91 vs. 93 octane [by (r + m)/2 method]

I've noticed that many SVXers on the boards are using 93 rated octane (where available). Here in Cali, the highest rating available is 91. This is also the minimum specified rating required by the SVX.

I've heard different opinions from different people, but does it really matter, in terms of better performance, if you use a higher-than-minimum rated octane?

Some people say the increases in performance are negligible. Some people say it definitely makes a difference. I, personally, can see both sides of this argument. I could understand why using 93 instead of 91 wouldn't make a difference, since your ECU creates the timing advance of the spark in presumption that you are utilizing 91. Then again, I could see the 93 taking advantage of this advance since it combusts more efficiently than 91. I'm no performance pro, but by simple logic, these are two possible sides that I see.

Would the knock sensors notice the difference between 91 and 93? I don't know exactly how the knock sensors function, but I understood that they only look for detonation.

I'm just sort of thinking aloud, but it is something to consider with the price of gas rising at such a ridiculous rate.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-21-2004, 06:08 AM
red95svx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Gas prices are raising quickly, but they aren't actually all that crazy. Gas has been $4-$5/gallon in many countries for years. I'm sure motorists in those countries would kill for $2.50/ gallon. And when you take inflation into consideration, gas prices are lower today then in 1980! But I digress...



I don't think the ECU would notice any difference. The knock sensors only "listen" for knocking or pinging, so I can't see how it would affect them either, as neither one of those octanes should cause pinging. I think it really comes down to prefference and availability.



Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-21-2004, 12:55 PM
tancred
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
My sister lives in north hollywood said there is a gas station there sells 106...must be for ferarri's and ****??
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-21-2004, 01:31 PM
lee lee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Indialantic, Florida
Posts: 2,940
93 would be better than 91 if the ECU detects knocking at 91. If no detect, then no advantage.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-21-2004, 10:25 PM
deruvian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by lee
93 would be better than 91 if the ECU detects knocking at 91. If no detect, then no advantage.
That's what I thought, too.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-24-2004, 06:11 PM
svxsubaru1's Avatar
svxsubaru1 svxsubaru1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 1,020
You could maybe reset your ECU to take advatage of the 93 octane, but if the ECu doesent sence knoking with 91 you wont gain performance by using 93, if anything you would lose horse power becasue the higher the octane the slower it burns.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122