View Single Post
  #15  
Old 04-24-2004, 08:51 PM
gl1674 gl1674 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 313
Sounds like a complete and utter fraud to me.
I've counted 6 things that are wrong:

1) Room temperature superconductor (Nobel prize for sure!)
2) No wires to conduct electricity (why do they need a superconductor then?)
3) Specific resonanse frequency from a static magnet? By the way what is the frequency? Is it patented yet?
4) Magnetic field to cause chemical reactions in organic (dielectric!) matter (another Nobel prize!)
5) More efficient combustion? Pardon me, but modern engines achieve >99% combustion efficiency as evidenced by HC and CO emissions anyway.
6) Accelerated combustion? Sounds like a detonation to me, the whole point of higher octane fuels is to burn slower so compression could be increased without causing too fast combustion...
Reply With Quote