08-07-2007, 05:04 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 5,223
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by b3lha
Fantastic! Thanks for the report.
I was able to test my adapter on two other SVXes at our recent meet. So far I have the following reports:
92 JDM VL (mine) = ECU - no, TCU - yes
94 JDM S40ii (mine) = ECU - yes, TCU - yes
92 JDM VL (Ron) = ECU - no, TCU - yes
92 JDM VL (SVXistentialist) = ECU - yes, TCU - yes
95 UK (SVXistentialist) = ECU - no, TCU - yes
92 USDM (UPnorth362) = ECU - no
94 USDM (UPnorth362) = ECU - yes
92 USDM (racerx9146) = ECU - yes
The interesting thing for me is that there are different results for identical cars.
Some ECUs are just plain faulty. I reckon that the signal they produce is slightly too out-of-spec or noisy for the converter chip to handle.
Phil.
|
Hi Phil,
You mention of noise, makes me wonder as to whether the ECU in question, particularly '92, have had the ferrite bead crushed, as per the much publicized mod.
Cheers, Trevor.
__________________
Trevor, New Zealand.
As a child, on cold mornings I gladly stood in cowpats to warm my bare feet, but I detest bull$hit! 
|