View Single Post
  #734  
Old 05-06-2008, 05:28 PM
oab_au oab_au is offline
Registered User
Subaru Gold Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Coffs Harb, Australia.
Posts: 5,032
Significant Technical Input Registered SVX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomake Wan View Post
If the VTD transfer layout is as Harvey's diagram shows, then it seems to coincide with my understanding of the BNR32's ATTESA-ETS transfer mechanism. Save for the fact that the front transfer shaft is internal on VTD and external on ATTESA-ETS.

In which case, I would wonder why putting no pressure on the clutch pack doesn't result in a 0/100 split. In ATTESA-ETS, when there is no transfer clutch application, the transmission is fully rear-drive. All they have to do is pull the ATTESA fuse and they've got RWD.

On our cars, you put a fuse in and get full lockup of the transfer clutch, for 50/50. Hm...

I mean, I realize that Nissan and Subaru aren't the same, but they're quite similar, and were fairly close entities back in the early 90's. So, I wonder. Does this mean that no pressure to the transfer clutch still results in partial application? The clutch can never fully disengage?

Otherwise, I cannot figure out how torque is getting up front with the clutch disengaged.
If the VTD clutch does not work, we just have a open center diff that will spin one set of wheels or the other.
The drive to both F/R wheels is mechanical.
The clutch plays no part in driving either end. It is only used to prevent wheel spin, and to alter the torque balance between the F/R.

Not the same as the Nissan.
Harvey.
__________________
One Arm Bloke.
Tell it like it is!

95 Lsi. Bordeaux Pearl, Aust. RHD.149,000Kls Subaru BBS wheels.
97 Liberty GX Auto sedan. 320,000Kls.
04 Liberty 30R Auto Premium. 92.000kls.
Reply With Quote