View Single Post
  #25  
Old 02-18-2004, 10:41 AM
Mr. Pockets's Avatar
Mr. Pockets Mr. Pockets is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 6,916
Send a message via ICQ to Mr. Pockets
Registered SVX
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: cant beat a toyota

Quote:
Originally posted by Chicane


Maybe you need to reread what I said. I've never called the Previa unreliable, I said I don't know anyone who has one, and cannot comment on their reliability since I have almost zero knowledge of them. And yeah, bash Chrysler, it makes sense to call a whole company unreliable when a few things fail on certain models. I mean subaru?! Subaru's are horribly unreliable POSs... they built this one car with a transmission that always failed, the brakes were too small, and the rear wheel bearings go out like crazy! Subaru sucks!

- Rob
http://autos.yahoo.com/consumerrepor...src=autos/eyak

Subaru has 3 cars in the 'good bets' list and zero in the 'reliability risks' list.

Chrysler, on the other hand, has zero cars in the former list and twelve in the latter.

I realize that some people question CR's methods, but I have yet to see any compelling evidence to contradict their findings.
__________________


2005 RX-8 Grand Touring
2005 Outback
2002 Mercedes-Benz E320 wagon

END OF LINE
Reply With Quote