View Single Post
  #8  
Old 03-06-2008, 06:27 PM
Myxalplyx's Avatar
Myxalplyx Myxalplyx is offline
XT6 is SVX's Daddy
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Castle, DE
Posts: 1,113
Send a message via ICQ to Myxalplyx Send a message via AIM to Myxalplyx Send a message via Yahoo to Myxalplyx
Quote:
Originally Posted by XT6Wagon View Post
while I wouldn't say its a good idea to tune by ear, atleast on turbocharged cars its possible to troubleshoot by ear.

9:1 is super "watery" almost drowned sounding and will often start having rich missfire issues.
10:1 is merly watery

14.7:1 is very thin, highpitched with minimal power
13:1 is high and thin compared to the desired 11.5:1 many people tune turbocharged cars to.
In the post I deleted I described a a rich (10.0 - 11.0) as a 'muffled, metaliic-like sound in a tunnel. Lean I described metallic-like sound that is not muffled or contained. I didn't want to sound like an idiot...but there it is. Richer muffles the sound and seems to make the car drive smoother. Leaner is more chaotic and feel/sounds like something is about to go wrong. Best I can describe it.

I can tell rich/lean conditions better with an EGT gauge than an actual rich/lean air/fuel ratio gauge. You may actually want to run leaner with higher octane or richer with lower octane, depending on what works for your ride.
__________________
Kevin Thomas
1997 2.2ltr Subaru Impreza Outback Sport Wagon (AWD/Auto) 13.03@100mph
1989 2.7ltr Subaru XT6 (AWD/Auto) 15.912@85.93mph
1996 3.3ltr SVX (AWD/Auto) 15.070@91.38mph
***R.I.P***
2010 RAV4 AWD Sport (13.717 @ 99.19mph )
2015 Honda Fit LX CVT (15.2 @ 90mph)
Reply With Quote