View Single Post
  #14  
Old 01-14-2003, 09:34 PM
Ron Mummert Ron Mummert is offline
Invisible avatar
Alcyone Gold Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Shawsville, VA (Formally Ellicott City, MD)
Posts: 3,797
Send a message via AIM to Ron Mummert Send a message via Yahoo to Ron Mummert
Cool

[QUOTE]Originally posted by lee
[B]Somebody should jump on me and pound away for spouting things that usually turn out to be tales of old and basically incorrect...maybe I'll be lucky this time??

But I always thought speed rating had a lot to do with sidewall rigidity. By that I mean a "Z" tire will contribute less flex to the total system compliance in response to impulse (bumps) than an equal size "H" tire. A side effect would be the amount a tire "rolled over" in spirited cornering, the "Z" rolling less, and therefore maintaining better traction - all else equal of course. It would be this reduced sidewall flex that then reduced temps and therefore allowed higher sustained speeds. Conversely, a lower letter would yield a slightly softer ride at the expense of sustained speed and cornering capability. All this ignores tread design and compound of course.


I thought that the ability to sustain higher speeds by higher rated tires had to do with the overall construction materials & bonding agents used. But I'll concede to anyone who actually knows. I wonder what the belted biased racing tires of 40-50 years ago had that kept 'em from disintegrating at speeds that would embarrass any street legal car of today.

Ron.
__________________
Good s**t happened. 69 was worth the wait.

'92 stock semi-pristine ebony - 160K
'96 Grand Caravan - 240K
'01 Miata SE - 79K
'07 Chrysler Pacifica - 60k - future money pit.
Reply With Quote