View Single Post
  #7  
Old 09-16-2010, 09:46 PM
subi-crosser's Avatar
subi-crosser subi-crosser is offline
Now with more color
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: cumberland, md
Posts: 2,452
Send a message via Yahoo to subi-crosser
Registered SVX Classic SVX
Re: Mustang vs. Mustang

[QUOTE=svxfiles;658045]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacky View Post
Most impressed by the braking in the 1970? Me too! 4ft. is pretty minuscule compared to the other improvements made.
24 mpg on a 2011 V6 is pathetic.
11 MPG on a 302? I used to get 12mpg on a 429 cu in. in a '69 Thunderbird.[/QUOTE]

And my rear tires would last, like a week!
I got 11 on a 460 Tow Truck pulling light. It did go down to 7 pulling heavy. (The truck weighs 8,400 empty)

My 65 Dodge A-100 got 25 mpg and would run 155 on the flat out. 318 3 speed, 2:73 rear w TALL tires, My 66 A-100 got 11 mpg and did 0-60 RFN!!
top speed, about 95. BUT the front tires left the ground at 20 MPH and set back down about 55. It got more mileage out of tires than it did driveshafts and wheel studs, or transmission mounts or cases.
__________________
I'm not a REDNECK! I am an Appalachian-AMERICAN!!

"Can't go to work today. The 'voices' said to "Stay home and clean the guns".


Most famous Red-Neck last words...
" Hey Everybody, Watch This!!)


http://s306.photobucket.com/albums/nn272/subi-crosser/
Jerry
Reply With Quote