Thread: STi air filter.
View Single Post
  #26  
Old 05-15-2007, 04:43 AM
Myxalplyx's Avatar
Myxalplyx Myxalplyx is offline
XT6 is SVX's Daddy
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Castle, DE
Posts: 1,113
Send a message via ICQ to Myxalplyx Send a message via AIM to Myxalplyx Send a message via Yahoo to Myxalplyx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor
Yes, did I not make the probable errors clear?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor
Briefly consider the principal of an atomizer, wave shape of the airflow, variations across the conducting cross section and the affect of RPM, all in relation to the figures published. The exercise requires expertise obviously beyond the ability of the author.
I do not deal with atomizer principals, wave shapes of airflows, variations across conducting cross sections, etc. I am not an expert any any of those fields as I am sure most people aren't. The article was simple and done for many people to understand. Measuring airflow does not have to be rocket science.

Sorry, I do not mean to take this thread out of context. Just wanted to show a means to measure the difference in effectiveness of airflow between the stock air filter and the STi air filter. That's all!
__________________
Kevin Thomas
1997 2.2ltr Subaru Impreza Outback Sport Wagon (AWD/Auto) 13.03@100mph
1989 2.7ltr Subaru XT6 (AWD/Auto) 15.912@85.93mph
1996 3.3ltr SVX (AWD/Auto) 15.070@91.38mph
***R.I.P***
2010 RAV4 AWD Sport (13.717 @ 99.19mph )
2015 Honda Fit LX CVT (15.2 @ 90mph)

Last edited by Myxalplyx; 05-15-2007 at 04:45 AM.
Reply With Quote