Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SVX10
Fixed it  I'm a bit of a "stickler" to the idea that the SVX is not an SVX without the 3.3L H6. Not saying the STI engine wouldn't be cool...it would be...but not an SVX. Do I sound like a prick yet? 
Anyway, back on topic now, even though the 6MT is heavier, it should actually preserve the "marginal" SVX front/rear weight balance. I'm doing a 5MT w/WRX tranny and I don't like the idea that 100lbs is going to be lost between the axles...that's where I want ALL my weight to be  |
Na, not a prick. Prick's are the "new" subie owners that hate on our cars. Not relizing it's the grandfather of the STi. As for the Engine. I agree that the EG33 is the soul of this car, just thought a 300hp engine with a better aftermarket would be fun to play with. But I'll settle for the 6MT, atleast I can get a nice clutch and work with the "will the brembos fit" question. 
__________________
1992 SVX LS-L: Now TomStock Stage 3... 6MT, R180 Rear, Tomstock Short Shifter and hard rubber mount, Group N Motor and Tranny Mount, Stage 2V6 Chip, Z32 MAF, Stage 3 CAI, Stebro, Intake Cams, 17" STi BBS Powder Coated Black, Bridgestone Potenza RE070, and Koni inserts w/Mychailo's Springs!
Sand Diego SCCA Solo 2 #308
RIP
84 VW Scirocco
02 WRX
88 XT6(regret the day I left her behind)
socaleuro.com They like the flat 6...
Check My New Homepage..
|