Re: FWD vs. MPT vs. VTD driving impressions
So, are you saying that the 4HEAT in USDM '94 SVXi and '95 L models without ABS all had 3.70 gear sets and the VTD setup? Up to now, I was under the impression that you had to source a 4HEAT from Japan or Australia to get VTD.
Thanks
Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by NiftySVX
The phenomenon which I am describing is the tendency of the front wheels to pull the vehicle in directions as the front wheels go over bumps. This phenomenon is eliminated in the VTD setup as far as I can tell. It is one of the most annoying FWD tendencies.
In any case, my point is that the car tracks much better. It seems that the geometry of the rear suspension is well suited to handling more than half of the torque, and the car really "feels" more like it is going where you point it instead of going where the front wheels are pulling it. It is difficult to describe.
As for which models had what:
All US models were 3.545 full time active MPT based AWD (ACT-4) EXCEPT:
1994 LE, L, LS models
1995 L models WITHOUT Active safety group option
JDM and AUS cars are VTD, along with some other regions. I believe germany got the ACT-4 where much of the UK got the VTD. Someone feel free to chime in here that knows the exact regions. The AUS VTD trans uses a different TCU and an internally mounted speed sensor no. 2. I believe one or two have modified it to work with the external unit.
|
__________________
Retired NASA Rocket Scientist
Most famous NASA "Child" - OSIRIS-REx delivered samples from asteroid BENNU to Earth in Sept. 2023
Center Network Member #989
'92 Fully caged, 5 speed, waiting for its fully built EG33
'92 "Test Mule", 4:44 Auto, JDM 4:44 Rear Diff with Mech LSD, Tuned headers, Full one-off suspension
'92(?) Laguna, 6 spd and other stuff (still at OT's place)
My Locker
|