View Single Post
  #11  
Old 03-03-2009, 12:27 PM
LetItSnow's Avatar
LetItSnow LetItSnow is offline
Still Cant' Say the Z-Word
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 2,338
Send a message via AIM to LetItSnow
Registered SVX
Re: Tomsvx Intake for Dummies

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1986nate View Post
He was saying that the 4 cyl boxers have as many as 3 resonate points, while the flat 6 seems to only have one resonate point, and that is why we have the resonator where it is. Removing our resonator does not effect the flat 6 as much as it does on the flat 4's. Or something like that.
This can only be speculation; who's to say to what degree the SVX's single resonator influences the intake?

Reading williaty's thread, he's proven that at low RPM, the MAF gets all sorts of confused without any resonators. Any bit of air that gets pulsed backward through the MAF causes a volume reading increase equal to that pulse, while the true volume is actually reduced by that amount.

The dyno readings of the TomMyx shown don't reflect the 1k-2k RPM range where williaty's readings show the MAF reporting substantially incorrect volumes.

It's not the difference of removing one being fewer than removing two. It's the difference between removing two out of three and removing all.

If only for the fact that I have no evidence to believe otherwise, I can't say that this is an issue with the SVX. The obvious similarities to the Impreza should lend to that there could be a comparable situation, though.

It would be interesting to see this tested before any hasty statements are made.
__________________
Disclaimer: The above post is on the internet.
Reply With Quote