View Single Post
  #11  
Old 04-18-2003, 06:57 PM
Seraph's Avatar
Seraph Seraph is offline
I abuse them one at a time
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Northbrook, Illinois, USA, Earth, Solar System... you get the picture
Posts: 7,176
Send a message via AIM to Seraph Send a message via Skype™ to Seraph
Quote:
Originally posted by thumper_svx
The reason you see such a variance in 0-60 times is that there is such a wide variation of SVX's.

FWD SVX's are typically faster than AWD...

- HOWEVER -

'92 and '93 SVX's tend to be faster than later models (and they were all AWD)

I haven't seen a comparison between a '92 AWD and a '94 or '95 FWD...

Since all 94+ models use the same ECU/TCU combo (different from 92/3), all of them are slower. I used to own a 92 and 94 FWD a while back. 92 is quicker without a doubt. 94 AWD and 92s have the same ride control. 94 FWD does not feel nice.

L
__________________
Lwin M. Maung (Member # 147)
Current SVX: NONE
Previous SVXes: •1994 LE Barcelona Red 107k • 1992 LS-L Pearl White 143k • 1994 LSi Bordeaux Pearl 220k • 1992 LS-L Ebony Pearl 184k • 1992 LS-L Liquid Silver 145k • 1992 LS-L Liquid Silver 102k • 1992 LS-L Ebony Pearl 123k
Other current cars:2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee Black
If at first you don't succeed, CHEAT!
Reply With Quote