View Single Post
  #3  
Old 02-15-2010, 03:31 PM
subi-crosser's Avatar
subi-crosser subi-crosser is offline
Now with more color
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: cumberland, md
Posts: 2,452
Send a message via Yahoo to subi-crosser
Registered SVX Classic SVX
Re: When used cars are more ecofriendly than a new car

Quote:
Originally Posted by Landshark View Post

In the range of '72-74' I had 2 cars that got over 25 mpg!
One was a 1964 Buick Special station wagon and the other was a 64 Rambler. BOTH cars would bury the speedometer at will...Both had V-8 engines and automatic trans. Buick had a Powerglide, 2 sp and the Rambler had a Chrysler 727.
Buick had a 310 Wildcat V-8, Rambler had a 287 Packard engine.

Now, IF a car that weighed over 3,000# got 25 MPG with 1964 tech, WHY are we not getting 50 MPG with #4,000. cars NOW??



MONEY!! Money for oil companies, money for government, money for whatever special interest group that will GAIN by our loss.

WE are being SCREWED by all the above!!

IF you never got 25 mpg and could BURY the speedo on a sled, you will not understand my thinking!
I actually got 29 MPG on a Dodge van with a 318 and a stick.The 'down side', was that I had a hard time NOT doing 100 MPH everywhere I went!!

I have 'documented' that this van would do 155 on the flat out.
I had a local Judge's nephew on a stopwatch, HE confirmed that we got 155 mph. The stop at the gas station confirmed that it happened at over 25 mpg!!

If anyone DOUBTS what I am saying, I can build another car that will do all the above out of stuff I have shoved under the bench.
__________________
I'm not a REDNECK! I am an Appalachian-AMERICAN!!

"Can't go to work today. The 'voices' said to "Stay home and clean the guns".


Most famous Red-Neck last words...
" Hey Everybody, Watch This!!)


http://s306.photobucket.com/albums/nn272/subi-crosser/
Jerry
Reply With Quote