"But, If it's a matter of performance, reliability, cost...have you considered it'd probably be half the cost for a 4.44 swap? "
Umm.. half the cost FOR a 4.44 swap ... Not half the cost OF 4.44 swap.
I think I know what I meant to say, but I realize that what I think I meant isn't what I think you heard. It could be that that you think I meant what I think I said, but I'm not sure if I accidentally obfuscated
![Embarrassment](images/smilies/redface.gif)
... Ahhh screw it..
Thanks for the clarity!!
You definitely clarified what I meant.... Cool!!
Thanks.
Chuck.