comparison
 

what is the better buy, all at the same price:

1. 2001 Audi TT 1.8T Coupe Quattro 6 sp. w/ 58k mi.

2. 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 w/ 71k mi.

3. 1992 Subaru SVX RA 5 sp.(40k mi.) and custom 7.4k rpm redline w/ 103k mi.:tard:

Not the Mitshu****ty.

You're asking a slightly biased crowd. What purpose will this car serve?

purpose
 

daily driver

I'd go for the Audi. I've wanted a TT since they first came out :p

Why is a 9 year newer Audi priced the same as an 'old' Subaru??

I guess my bias is showing. If you are going to drive it into the ground, buy a Legacy, If you have a 20 mile commute, buy the SVX. ( we gotta protect them) all them other cars are 'forign' cars and can be used up.

How much?

I would go #1, if #1 is sold, then #2,,,,, not sure about #3.

Just me. :)

And why do you own then 2 of #3?

:p:p:p

(Dr.Jackel and Mr.Hyde)

i'd say the Audi or Mitsu, because if all are priced equal, the SVX is WAAAAAAAY overpriced. :p

Didn't you just spend a fortune to make your SVX as you wanted? If so, why would you sell it, and buy another SVX? Doesn't make much sense. I'd buy the 3000gt, because i have 2 SVX's and a legacy already, and I've always wanted a 3000gt.

3KGT ftw!!

As a daily driver I think an RA 5MT SVX will be absolute death on gas. Audi gets my vote.

the svx, subarus run forever, mistubishi's will cost you as much as a carpayment in repairs. and the audi will triple your car payment in repair bills.
i'm not biased i just hate vw/audi with a massive passion

Having been a master tech at a euro shop I +1 JEFFAST.

:D thank you,

was a typo...:rolleyes:

actually the order is #1, then #3, then #2. :)