![]() |
Re: K & N air filter
Quote:
|
Re: K & N air filter
interesting...could this be the cause of the chugging, as i call it?
|
Re: K & N air filter
Quote:
The "how to" section is certainly due for an edit and sort out, as it forms such a very valuable part of this forum. Trevor. |
Re: K & N air filter
Quote:
All the while possibly damaging anything in it's path. The question is - are the size of the particles passed large enough to do damage with the clearances in our engines? To me it's irrelevant. I simply don't want to put that much extra dirt into my engine when I plan on keeping my cars for hundreds of thousands of miles. A while ago I calculated the cfm at peak torque for our 08 tribeca to determine if the stock paper filter was starving it. It was not. It flowed more than enough. With 0.3 L less displacement and the larger filter that the svx has, I feel confident that a paper filter in our airbox also flows more than enough air. This makes the performance claim of K&N simply not true in a stock svx. So - more dirt and no more performance. What is the point of the K&N? Oh yeah, it lasts a million miles. :WTF: |
Re: K & N air filter
Quote:
How long would you say it takes for your airbox to see a pound of dirt? Miles or time - your choice. How big (volume) is a pound of dirt? How about 6.6 grams (the difference between the thread-subject-chosen K&N and the best-in-test AC Delco)? Would you eat 6.6 grams of dirt for a dollar? How about over the course of a year? Don't let percentages and bench tests that don't reflect real world situations scare you; look at real, raw numbers before declaring that the end is nigh. |
Re: K & N air filter
I had a k&n on my little red wagon for a long time. The oil was black before I even hit 3k mile change interval every time. I always hated that but didn't know the filter was the cause. I put that same piece of junk filter into my svx when I first got it with the same results. Only later did I realize the filter was at fault and I threw that pos into the trash. With a paper filter my oil is still clean on the dipstick when I change it. I like that.
The test shows real numbers proving that the oiled filters let more dirt in. Whether they represent a minute, hour, week, month, or year of driving in the real world to achieve the specific weight is not estimated and would be difficult to test or guesstimate. You can subscribe to the k&n advertisement pitch of more horsepower with no downside or you can choose to protect your engine as best as you can with a filter that is scientifically shown to filter more efficiently. |
Re: K & N air filter
The only thing I'm subscribing to is the fact that you can make numbers out to be whatever you want them to be.
It took damn near a quarter pound of dirt to end the test for the K&N (our topic subject, remember, and a filter bashed by SPICER pre-test, fwiw) and 0.22 cubic inch of the stuff got through the filter. That's smaller than a sugar cube! I don't think that the sum of the dirt that found its way to the airbox in my Legacy and that in my SVX (combined, over 80k miles) has met a quarter pound. That would work its way out to a gram a year if SPICER's test's figures hold true. In a four-oil-change year, that's a quarter gram. That's probably the size of a sesame seed. That's smaller than this emoticon: :tard: I'm not going to tell you which filter is best for you, or which one is worst, and I'm not defending the K&N because it's in my car. I'm telling you that the numbers in the test are hype at best. Numbers are numbers. What they mean is up to their appropriate interpretation. I suppose you could decide that whether you eat a regular hamburger or a Big 'n' Tasty before you hit the dragstrip might critically influence your ET. After all, the Big 'n' Tasty is bigger, right? ;) |
Re: K & N air filter
What about oilless high flow air filters? How do those perform in comparison? ie a Green 2019? Does anybody run one of these and how does it perform?
|
Re: K & N air filter
If there was cheap horsepower to be had without compromising reliability don't you think the manufacturer would be all over it?
Instead of K&N why not fabricate some expanded metal screening, rice cakes and Wesson Oil for your filter? I can see this idea going viral in about 45 seconds... :rolleyes: |
Re: K & N air filter
My '96 59k miler is on it's 3rd MAF with a standard air filter. It has a flat spot (half power) between 1,800 rpm and 2,400 rpm. After that, it's amazing - pulls like a train. Oh, and it's fine when cold. It's on it's second brand new MAF from Subaru but they last 1/2 a day and show up code 23 and the car runs like a moped. Any ideas anyone? There are only about 35 RHD left in the Uk so no-one has a clue here.....
|
Re: K & N air filter
Quote:
|
Re: K & N air filter
based on this video, which seems to be based on real data, air filters don't add power
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAIxeQUSg-Q now for the engine protection purposes, I doubt that a high flow air filter would do any better than the cheaper ones...but I haven't done tests on either... |
Re: K & N air filter
|
Re: K & N air filter
BACK IN THE OLD DAYS I had a 1966 Dodge Dart GT 273 4 barrel . Someone stole my air cleaner. I replaced it with a small paper air leaner. Sounded great when that 4 barrel opened. Well after 35,000 miles the car was using a qt of oil in 500 miles. We took the motor apart and found that the motor was actually bored out by all the dirt that the crappy air filter let in . The ring gap was .050 over size . So between the ring wear and bore wear the rings lost there spring, and allowed the oil to pass. Moral of this story clean air is better than that 1/2 HP gain. <LOL> :rolleyes:
|
Re: K & N air filter
I put one of these in about a year ago. I doubt it caused the problems I am having now, but this is an interesting thread. I will go back to a stock filter.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122