PDA

View Full Version : Biggest socialist program in 40 years!


benebob
12-19-2008, 09:12 AM
... Brought to you by that wonderfully conservative President. George "Red" Bush!

Aren't you glad we invested billions in companies who couldn't even get a government backed loan from a government backed bank using government money.

I guess Barack isn't the only socialist in Washington:rolleyes:. It now lies in the hands of the Supreme Court to do the right thing. I won't hold my breath.

svxxx26
12-19-2008, 10:26 AM
Don't hold back, say what you really feel! :D

But seriously, I've heard arguments do that effect and agree "in principle" - although on the other hand, I can agree with Bush on this too.

Since you seem pretty sure on this subject, maybe you can explain to me how letting the Big Three sink on their own is going to help US?

And please don't say because it's socialist...that means nothing to me. What does mean something the overall economy of the country. Or to be more specific, in principle a company that fails should be left to die - that's how the system works - but if the industry dictates the survival other companies (and people's jobs) is it the right thing to do?

benebob
12-19-2008, 10:49 AM
Since you seem pretty sure on this subject, maybe you can explain to me how letting the Big Three sink on their own is going to help US?


In the long run it would help as the strongest best companies would survive. This is simply putting a bandaid on a sucking chest wound. In the end the companies won't survive because they don't have the bankrupcy laws which are there to make it easier to renegotiate with creditors. The car companies argue that people won't buy cars from a bankrupt company but how many people will buy cars from a less stable company then if the company and the buyers are protected by the bankruptcy laws.

The British did the exact same thing back in the late 70s and when was the last time you could buy a MG, Triumph, Sunbeam, Roots, Rover, Hillman. They all died because they were given a blank check (with the same kind of "so called" safe guards that Bush has called for).

So what is your suggestion? Give 'me 17 billion now and then where are you going to get the extra money that is going to be needed when all these workers loose their jobs anyways as the companies downsize, outsource to mexico and fire the American workers anyways? Of course they are going to need unemployment, retraining then comes the gov't incentives to intice other businesses into the areas of these deplaced workers.

Bush's philosphy seems to be give 'em money that we don't have already rather than having the lenders do their jobs. Lend money to solvent companies. Just like Ford claims to be

Wikedjuggalo
12-19-2008, 10:53 AM
I'm confused everything you post is socialist this or you don't agree with this or that. What form of government works for you? Its so easy to tell all the people associated with Gm, Chrysler, and Ford to go find other jobs o well. But what would you do in their position? Do I think they messed up? Hell yeah but we helped all the banks out even tho they messed up horribly (mostly due to Democratic pushes). We shouldn't deny helping to lower people just because of mismanagement.

Clearly we shouldn't just hand over 17 billion dollars. There are stipulations that need to be addressed before handing it over.

benebob
12-19-2008, 11:52 AM
I'm confused everything you post is socialist this or you don't agree with this or that. What form of government works for you? Its so easy to tell all the people associated with Gm, Chrysler, and Ford to go find other jobs o well. But what would you do in their position? Do I think they messed up? Hell yeah but we helped all the banks out even tho they messed up horribly (mostly due to Democratic pushes). We shouldn't deny helping to lower people just because of mismanagement.

Clearly we shouldn't just hand over 17 billion dollars. There are stipulations that need to be addressed before handing it over.


Newsflash, these people you speak of are still going to loose their jobs regardless (or a very large percentage of them will). The others will be stuck in mostly high cost of living states and be forced to take a drastic pay cut. When you have a budget based on your income and then 30% is cut you're not helping the economy when you have to declare personal bankrupcy are you?

If your so interested in helping these people out why then isn't that 17 billion going to the 5 million Americans who rely directly on the auto industry for their jobs. If I'm doing the math correctly each one would receive a $340k severence check. Don't you think that would be more beneficial then putting a dying company on life support at our expense for the next 6 months. Are you going to go out and plunk $25k on a new Chevy now? Didn't think so.

Read up on the British bailout of their auto industry and its failure. The US is following the EXACT same path

Wikedjuggalo
12-19-2008, 11:56 AM
Newsflash, these people you speak of are still going to loose their jobs regardless (or a very large percentage of them will). The others will be stuck in mostly high cost of living states and be forced to take a drastic pay cut. When you have a budget based on your income and then 30% is cut you're not helping the economy when you have to declare personal bankrupcy are you?

If your so interested in helping these people out why then isn't that 17 billion going to the 5 million Americans who rely directly on the auto industry for their jobs. If I'm doing the math correctly each one would receive a $340k severence check. Don't you think that would be more beneficial then putting a dying company on life support at our expense for the next 6 months. Are you going to go out and plunk $25k on a new Chevy now? Didn't think so.

Read up on the British bailout of their auto industry and its failure. The US is following the EXACT same path
You still havent answered my questions to you.

benebob
12-19-2008, 12:14 PM
You still havent answered my questions to you.

What question? I prefer a true capatialist society with a Federal Government that performs its Constitutional duty of providing for the defense of the country. So yes I believe in socialism for the military, infastructure and common health and well being of the citizens as without the second two you cannot have soldiers able to fight.

As for what would I do in their position. Well considering it isn't like they've collapsed over night I would have positioned myself to loose my job (just as I positioned myself for the current economic downturn in my business), I would have begun the process of retraining myself for a new career, I would have worked to bring my company to the highest level of efficency and productivity that I could from whatever position I held and I probably would have moved years ago to a state which was much more diverse economy wise then most of the states where the Big Three have a large workforce.

Again what help is this package going to give to the worker? Even an idiot doesn't see them walking away with $340k in benefits which is their share of that money. Either way America has lost a strong auto industry which will never return. I would just prefer the money be spent for the true role of government.

If you don't agree then go ahead burn the Constitution and set up a Socialist State of George "Red" Bush.

svxxx26
12-19-2008, 05:03 PM
I have to say that you put forth a good argument Ben. Clearly the "good old days" of doing business are long gone and it's going to be a cold slap in the face for everyone. Damn but the auto workers had it pretty good for a long time. I hate to see the glory days of Detroit end but then again, I think they ended a long time ago.
I see where Obama chimed in with his support for Bush's auto bailout plan, so I suppose it's a done deal.
I love politics:(

benebob
12-19-2008, 05:59 PM
I have to say that you put forth a good argument Ben. Clearly the "good old days" of doing business are long gone and it's going to be a cold slap in the face for everyone. Damn but the auto workers had it pretty good for a long time. I hate to see the glory days of Detroit end but then again, I think they ended a long time ago.
I see where Obama chimed in with his support for Bush's auto bailout plan, so I suppose it's a done deal.
I love politics:(

Subeman90 told me about a editorial in our local paper a few weeks back so I found and read it. Basically the writer asked where the "bailout" was for the workers of the following, Packard, where it was for Studie, where it was for Cord, where it was for AMC, etc. As sypathetic as one can be for the hard working individuals working for the companies, dealers, suppliers and third parties associated saving companies who for 30 years have ignored reality is nothing more than becoming insane yourself.

Bankruptcy is the only real option. Just look how much it cost GM to kill off Oldsmobile. It took 8 years and 500 million to kill one company without the benefit of bankruptcy laws since many dealers got a huge payout because of contracts, etc. I'd say that there are at least 10 MUCH larger brands that should join Olds in any restructuring plan. In today's world that should cost a conservative 5 billion alone not to mention the 8 years it would take to accomplish. Do you want to support GM for 8 years financially while they kill off the same brands they're selling for 7 of those 8 years? Who is going to buy that Pontiac, that Saturn, that GMC, that Buick, that Saab, that Pontiac, that Hummer and that Isuzu truck line.

Stilor
12-19-2008, 10:28 PM
If your so interested in helping these people out why then isn't that 17 billion going to the 5 million Americans who rely directly on the auto industry for their jobs. If I'm doing the math correctly each one would receive a $340k severence check.

You are not doing math correctly.

17 000 000 000 / 5 000 000 = 3 400, not 340 000

However, I don't see why the government did not consider the same approach they took with some of the banks by engineering a merger. For example, government could've loaned money to Ford to buy assets from GM - that is, plants with workers. The question is, would Ford agree, though :)

demonsvx
12-19-2008, 11:54 PM
Corporate greed, mismanagement, $hitty cars, no innovative ideas, brand overload, unions,etc. need I go on? Remember what happened when we gave AIG bailout money? They had a big party and failed anyway. Bernard Madoff, I would be surprised if this a$$hole doesnt come up dead-50 Billion lost-where did it go? When is America going to wake up and decide we have had enough? Obama isnt going to fix it anytime soon unless there is MASSIVE regulation and reform-translation-a more socialist country. Bush set the police state in motion and the future administration will enforce it. Ask yourself why ammo has went thru the roof? To curtail a possible revolution when we hit 20-30% unemployment and almost certain depression. I'm saving my ammo for the bankers when they come to collect, greedy a$$holes:mad:

Noir
12-20-2008, 07:06 AM
Well considering it isn't like they've collapsed over night I would have positioned myself to loose my job (just as I positioned myself for the current economic downturn in my business), I would have begun the process of retraining myself for a new career, I would have worked to bring my company to the highest level of efficency and productivity that I could from whatever position I held and I probably would have moved years ago to a state which was much more diverse economy wise then most of the states where the Big Three have a large workforce.



+1 agreed. Those who don't choose to abandon a sinking ship deserves to drown.

ensteele
12-20-2008, 12:20 PM
Ethics are long gone, just like the good ol days. :( Unfortunately Corporate greed along with Political greed are alive and well in this country, and Joe the worker will have to pay for it. :mad:

benebob
12-20-2008, 01:28 PM
I'm saving my ammo for the bankers when they come to collect, greedy a$$holes:mad:

Yes I'm sure the bankers forced you to sign those loans.:confused: When you're calling someone a greedy a$$hole you may just want to wipe the steam off the mirror first. They would simply be asking for what YOU owe them and YOU did not complete your end of the contract.

gstape
12-20-2008, 01:47 PM
I am usually a conservative free market guy, but I support Bush's move.

Do you guys have any idea how intertwined the automotive supply base is? I can gaurentee you that if GM went down Toyota would be severly hurt. If GM goes down so do a bunch of tier one suppliers. If they go down so do their suppliers. Even if all Tier one suppliers are ok (which they are not) I can gaurentee a bunch of tier two or three suppliers will die. If that happens Toyota shuts down a bunch of plants, so does Honda, VW, Hyundai, even our beloved Subaru. It will take a long time for the industry as a whole to re-adjust, change suppliers, move tools, re launch... That is all down time and cost in an industry that really can't afford it (Honda pulled out of F1, Subaru out of FIA world rally) You know to do that they are hurting too.

I gotta think that the ripple effect throughout the economy would be large. $17 billion is only .1 % of the US GDP. and I would bet the downward effect of a failed GM would be much more than that.

JD Power would disagree with the "shi*ty" GM car comment. And so would the 4 million (in a normal 16 SAAR year) domestic customers that they have.

I'm not sold on a bail out being the best course of action, but I am sold that a rapid failure of GM would be a really bad thing for the Country.

As for what would I do in their position. Well considering it isn't like they've collapsed over night I would have positioned myself to loose my job (just as I positioned myself for the current economic downturn in my business), I would have begun the process of retraining myself for a new career, I would have worked to bring my company to the highest level of efficency and productivity that I could from whatever position I held and I probably would have moved years ago to a state which was much more diverse economy wise then most of the states where the Big Three have a large workforce.

Easy to say.

And no I don't work for GM or Chrysler. (I do however work for a tier 2 supplier that sells indirectly to Honda, Toyota, Suzuki, Subaru, Hyundai (Kia), GM, Ford, Chrysler, and probably more that I am not aware of)

Any way thats my two cents :o

Noir
12-20-2008, 02:32 PM
Maybe socialism really isn't that bad. I wish the gov't would come and take my bosses business off his hands.

liamrh
12-20-2008, 07:49 PM
even tho they messed up horribly (mostly due to Democratic pushes).

Lol, try again....or do you mean in contrast to Oligarchical pushes?

Wikedjuggalo
12-20-2008, 08:03 PM
Lol, try again....or do you mean in contrast to Oligarchical pushes?

No I was referring to the credit market. Everyone is to blame for that crap. We (American citizens) accepted horrible credit terms and banks for offering them. The government pushed for this in the housing acts etc etc (sure we have all beaten this subject into the ground). Its so easy to say screw them and let them fail when you personally have no attachments to this (Nor do I). Yeah lets let them fail its not like we will see an affect from it ! Screw it! let people loose this jobs due to this crap. Benebob I think you'd do best in an anarchy because you seem to hate everything the government does.

demonsvx
12-21-2008, 10:59 AM
Yes I'm sure the bankers forced you to sign those loans.:confused: When you're calling someone a greedy a$$hole you may just want to wipe the steam off the mirror first. They would simply be asking for what YOU owe them and YOU did not complete your end of the contract.

No I wasnt forced to sign ANY loans I did it on my own accord. What Im trying to say is where money was borrowed to underqualified persons.....and the banks KNEW IT. What pisses me off about the whole thing is working class America pays for someone else's mistakes and then bails them out when the $hit hits the fan. Im sure if you or me lost their jobs due to mismanagement or "cooking the books" you would be a little upset, especially when the banks came to collect.Look at your 401k, what a joke...where the money go. I know what I owe and intend to pay it. But I wont put up with losing everything I work hard for due to the "domino effect" of all of this. This is what they will get when they show up to my house:mad:. At least I will keep the Firemen employed
http://fire.oshtemo.org/NAOFD/Images/News%20Items/KL%20Burn/House%20Burn%20001web.jpg

benebob
12-21-2008, 02:49 PM
No I wasnt forced to sign ANY loans I did it on my own accord. What Im trying to say is where money was borrowed to underqualified persons.....and the banks KNEW IT. What pisses me off about the whole thing is working class America pays for someone else's mistakes and then bails them out when the $hit hits the fan. Im sure if you or me lost their jobs due to mismanagement or "cooking the books" you would be a little upset, especially when the banks came to collect.Look at your 401k, what a joke...where the money go. I know what I owe and intend to pay it. But I wont put up with losing everything I work hard for due to the "domino effect" of all of this. This is what they will get when they show up to my house:mad:. At least I will keep the Firemen employed
http://fire.oshtemo.org/NAOFD/Images/News%20Items/KL%20Burn/House%20Burn%20001web.jpg


Well since my boss works for me I think I'd know if I was cooking my own books. To me there is nothing wrong with cooking the books so long as it is done legally (which 99% of it is). There is no difference between that or all the other legal ways to get out of paying taxes.

As for my 401k it like any investment is just that, an investment which can increase, decrease or cease to exist tomorrow. If you don't have money to throw away then you don't have money to invest.

Maybe you should instead of pointing your guns around think about the reality that you'll have to be giving those back to the banker who is simply fullfilling his end of a contract by collecting.;)LOL

Oh and as for your house burning, that's just another example of your failure to meet those obligations that YOU agreed to which would then cause the investor who owns your loan to suffer that horrible domino effect that you won't stand for. You'll just pass it on to someone else.:rolleyes:

demonsvx
12-21-2008, 04:40 PM
I dont think you see the point Im trying to make. I am responsible for my actions, correct? I would love to fufill my obligations that I agreed to legally by working and paying on time. But what if the bottom falls out of the economy? Who bails me or you or the next common working man out? Sure as hell the government is covering the big hitters first... AIG, Dodge, GM, etc. because obviously they are large corporations that employ thousands of people. What I dont like is being told by our government that it will get much worse in 2009 when most of them knew in the 1999-2001 timeframe of deregulated bank loans who were given out to just anyone. Gladly as of right now Im still employed and I hope you are to, Im not trying to argue with you but the whole mess pisses me off. Its sad to see Americans lose their jobs and homes due to "savvy investors" who dont give a $hit about them. Anyway Benebob I wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

benebob
12-21-2008, 06:11 PM
I dont think you see the point Im trying to make. I am responsible for my actions, correct? I would love to fufill my obligations that I agreed to legally by working and paying on time. But what if the bottom falls out of the economy? Who bails me or you or the next common working man out? Sure as hell the government is covering the big hitters first... AIG, Dodge, GM, etc. because obviously they are large corporations that employ thousands of people. What I dont like is being told by our government that it will get much worse in 2009 when most of them knew in the 1999-2001 timeframe of deregulated bank loans who were given out to just anyone. Gladly as of right now Im still employed and I hope you are to, Im not trying to argue with you but the whole mess pisses me off. Its sad to see Americans lose their jobs and homes due to "savvy investors" who dont give a $hit about them. Anyway Benebob I wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

I see it loud and clear. You are getting your bailout now alla trickle down economics. The economic cycle of Capatialism has a much bigger boom/bust then does other forms of economics. Deregulation was simply government trying to get out of the economies way and return to a purer form of capitalism. The biggest part of the problem we're in now is that the elected government due to extremely poor fiscal responsiblity is not in a position to make these kinds of investments. They are simply 6 points down with 2 seconds left and preparing a hail mary pass. If it fails (wait WHEN IT FAILS) there will be no time or money left and we'll be the spitting image of Britain in the early 80s.

Ever look at your 401k and what's in those mutual funds btw. I'd bet 10 to 1 that you are one of those "savvy inverstors" whether you know it or not. Is it Christmas?:D I haven't noticed as those drives by the mall are actually possible.:D

demonsvx
12-21-2008, 06:21 PM
I do have a 401k account but dont really do much with it and only contribute 2% as my company contributes up to 200% on that and 100% up to a 7%contribution. So who is the savvy investor now:D Some people that I work with go in there everyday and move stuff around where I tend to leave it alone. But what safe choice do we have nowadays for retirement? Oh and while we are on the subject read this. It will get you going:D http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081221/ap_on_bi_ge/meltdown_corporate_jets

Wikedjuggalo
12-21-2008, 06:26 PM
The Benebob is never pleased! No government actions are right in his eyes!

benebob
12-22-2008, 08:14 AM
The Benebob is never pleased! No government actions are right in his eyes!


FYI I do work for this government that according to you I dislike. I think the Federal Government does some fine things like building the strongest military in the world, has set up an infastructure (though probably not a sustainable one) that is the envy of the world and has a judicial system that is as pefect as it can be when humans are involved.

benebob
12-22-2008, 08:21 AM
I do have a 401k account but dont really do much with it and only contribute 2% as my company contributes up to 200% on that and 100% up to a 7%contribution. So who is the savvy investor now:D Some people that I work with go in there everyday and move stuff around where I tend to leave it alone. But what safe choice do we have nowadays for retirement? Oh and while we are on the subject read this. It will get you going:D http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081221/ap_on_bi_ge/meltdown_corporate_jets

You must not understand what a 401k is then. YOU are invested in those same banks that you blame for the current situation who believe profits (and stockholders such as yourself). It takes a lot of research to know what you have in a fund, it takes even more work to find one that doesn't buy stock in one of the most reliable and conservative investments on the stock market... financial institutions.

I have absolutely no opinion on the corporate jets as if I was making a multi million dollar deal with a company I wouldn't trust the bean counter that I had to pick up from the airport and collect and carry his bags would you?:D

demonsvx
12-22-2008, 04:23 PM
You must not understand what a 401k is then. YOU are invested in those same banks that you blame for the current situation who believe profits (and stockholders such as yourself). It takes a lot of research to know what you have in a fund, it takes even more work to find one that doesn't buy stock in one of the most reliable and conservative investments on the stock market... financial institutions.

I have absolutely no opinion on the corporate jets as if I was making a multi million dollar deal with a company I wouldn't trust the bean counter that I had to pick up from the airport and collect and carry his bags would you?:D

You are correct on the choice of where I invest my money (Fidelity) but where I have a problem is the trust and risk we take in those investments. I am not blaming the entire government as they have great programs that do help. The problem is where were they 10 yrs go to stop the abuses? I have myself made bad choices as Im sure you have to but advice is just that ,advice. So if you are a gubberment employee you will be a integral part of the Biggest socialist program in 40 years! What will be your choice? Complain or conform?

benebob
12-23-2008, 08:18 AM
So if you are a gubberment employee you will be a integral part of the Biggest socialist program in 40 years! What will be your choice? Complain or conform?

No my job won't change a bit I simply enforce the codes which set down the minimum standards for building the crappiest legal structure allowed by law.

demonsvx
12-23-2008, 10:40 AM
So your a Code Enforcer eh? Law enforcement or other?

Noir
12-26-2008, 01:46 PM
or "cooking the books" you would be a little upset

you gotta do the cooking by the book. you know you can not be lazy....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-azqXygCzO8

Landshark
12-26-2008, 03:15 PM
you gotta do the cooking by the book. you know you can not be lazy....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-azqXygCzO8


i prefer the remix .... :lol:

UfLAv3JHRwY

shelfy
12-26-2008, 03:28 PM
i prefer the remix .... :lol:

UfLAv3JHRwY

it looked like a cute little cartoon, but then... :eek:

Wikedjuggalo
12-26-2008, 06:30 PM
Where was i?

Noir
12-27-2008, 10:54 AM
i prefer the remix .... :lol:



loll3rsk4t3s....that's too funny man.

hWhat?? Yeeeeeah... OHkaaay!!!

Royal Tiger
01-11-2009, 12:01 PM
i prefer the remix .... :lol:




That was some funny sh!t right there. :lol:

lhopp77
02-14-2009, 06:43 PM
NOT TO BE OUTDOWN--Socialist Prez NoBama and the liberal Democrats pass the largest EVER spending bill!!!!!! :eek:

Lee


... Brought to you by that wonderfully conservative President. George "Red" Bush!

Aren't you glad we invested billions in companies who couldn't even get a government backed loan from a government backed bank using government money.

I guess Barack isn't the only socialist in Washington:rolleyes:. It now lies in the hands of the Supreme Court to do the right thing. I won't hold my breath.

Francis
03-21-2009, 06:22 AM
Hahahahhaa....this Video Is Awesome:d

bwb3
06-01-2009, 11:42 AM
From the on-line edition of PRAVDA, 04-27-2009. Sad when even they say it.

"It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American decent into Marxism is happening with breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people."

Gene